• Archives

  • Topics

  • Meta

  • The Boogeyman - Working Vacation
  • Coming Home
  • Via Serica

Another Train to Nowhere

Recently, I took issue with the tripling of cost and multi-decade timeline for a fast rail project to connect the big cities in California.  I was aghast at the cost overruns before the first shovel of dirt had been dug.

Now I find that San Francisco, also known as Pyongyang on the Bay, has a much smaller project that costs more per yard than anything I’ve ever heard of. But I promise to discuss it rationally and calmly.

San Francisco is trying to dig a two mile subway tunnel.  The citizenry of San Fransisco approved the project in 2003, with an expected price tag of about $650 million.  That’s right, they expected it to cost over $300 million a mile to put in a new subway line.

Deep breath.  Remember, rational and calm

But now in 2011, eight years later, they’ve finally started digging, and they hope to start tunneling next year and be done by 2018 with an expected price tag of $1.6 billion.

Deep breath. Come on, DaddyBear, you can do this.

Most of that money is expected to come from the federal government, or as I like to call it, my taxes.

Deep breath.

OK, forget rational and calm.  Are you freaking kidding me?  These bluntskulls want to put a two mile subway tunnel into a city known for shaking itself to the ground and setting itself on fire, at a cost of billions of dollars and over a decade of time?  And you want me and the rest of the people in the country who pay taxes to foot the bill?  Have you all lost your ever loving, patchouli smelling, Prius driving minds?

Did something happen to the water in California over the past few decades?  Did they start using lead pipes to bring in water the way that Rome did, and this is the pathetic result?  Is this what you get when all the hippies at Haight-Ashbury take too much bad acid and then procreate?

You know, someday I hope to wake up and find that all the stupid people have pulled a lemming and walked into the surf all at once.  But it’s a forlorn hope.  The stupid people wouldn’t want to see me that happy.

IT People I Have Known

I’ve been working in IT for about 20 years, starting out as “that guy” in my office to being a somewhat skilled SySad, depending on the phase of the moon.  Over the years, I’ve noticed that there are a few types of organisms that keep popping up in my little IT ecosystem.

  • The Gadget Guy – This strange animal is always carrying around the new hawtness from ThinkGeek, Apple, Google, or Microsoft.  Examples of this species have paid more for gaming rigs, laptops, cell phones, smart phones, and touch pads than I have on cars over the years.  Can be known by their ability to always find a way to be touching and playing with a new toy, which it will use for about six weeks before it pays out full price for the next big thing.  It is also good at bringing any conversation around to either its latest find or the next big thing that it plans to pre-order and then stand in line for at 4 AM.  This animal is also the person who refuses to support legacy hardware and software, instead using company money to chase the new hawtness in OS, hardware, and programming language.  While usually quite talented, it can be frustrating to take over  a project after they have moved onto the next shiny object, because you have to make heads or tails of their RubyC#PERLJavaJavascriptOnRails magnum opus and keep it up and running.
  • The Project Manager – Some specimens of this start out as actual technical people, gaining experience in what it takes to actually do the jobs they are now trying to schedule.  The ones that seem to pop up in my memory are former DreamWeaver jockeys who figured out how to make a gantt chart after the dotcom bust.  Can be known by their ability to use words like ‘leverage’, ‘synergy’, or ‘enterprise’.  Extreme examples don’t really care whether or not the project they’re managing was successful, so long as it failed on time and on budget.
  • The Technology Manager – This funny animal is a remnant of past times.  They fondly remember setting up compute clusters on a Vax, serial hardware dongles that were used as software licenses, and networking using two inch wide copper wire.  They can be known by their inability to ‘get’ virtualization, security, or really anything that was developed after 1985.
  • The Tusker – This is an evolutionary cousin of the Technology Manager, but is actually quite useful. It also remembers VMS, SNA, COBOL, and all of the other things that were developed for the Apollo missions, and in some instances is still taking care of them.  However, it remembers all of the technical details and can sometimes relate the concepts to new technology.  It may not be interested in learning the guts of KVM, but at least it doesn’t dismiss it as new-fangled nonsense.  Well, not much, anyway.  It is called the Tusker because it’s like an old elephant, who is just hanging on long enough to die happy.  Extreme examples of this group are also known as the RBDP:  Retired But Drawing Paycheck.
  • The Haxor – An example of parallel evolution, in that this creature emulates the behavior and values of the Mall Ninja.  The Black Hat fancies itself as a security expert, and takes every opportunity to try to figure out everyone’s passwords, get into their email, and generally be a nuisance to all who it touches.  Unless forced to by a dress code, it wears old, baggy cargo pants or shorts, and a seemingly endless array of Black Hat, SANS, ThinkGeek, and vendor give-away tee shirts.  Hired to help lock down and protect systems and networks, he visualizes his responsibilities as telling war stories from his latest LAN war and trying to penetrate the systems instead of protecting them.  Talk of configuring iptables and Snort bores this animal, as those are defensive in nature, and it only uses its skills in the offense. 
  • The Old Shaman – Normally, a Unix or Mainframe guy, but some older Microsoft people are gaining this title as well.  These creatures have been working on the same technology for many years, and have the scars to show for it.  Each of these scars is catalogued and the place, time, and event that brought it into being can be talked about at length, especially if multiple Old Shamen were involved and are there to talk about them. While their technology may be old, it is still a powerful force in the company, and these Shaman are the wise old men who will be there to bring along the Gadget Guy and the Haxor when they age out of their adolescence.  Extreme examples have scars from VMS, Windows, and Unix, and can knit beautiful solutions using technology from multiple platforms into works of geek art that will not survive their passing from the scene.
  • The Bushy Tailed NeoPhyte – This newcomer to the ecosystem can evolve into any of the above fauna.  It’s kind of the stem cell of our little ecosystem.  If paid well, it can morph into the Gadget Guy.  If given too much time on their hands, they can become the Haxor.  Eventually, they will evolve into some of the older species.  The Neophyte can be known by the fact that their dominant hand is usually filled with a RedBull or some other sweet concoction, they still wear their college clothes to the office, and may still talk passionately about how they want to use their talents in technology to make the world a better place.  Eventually, their soul will be crushed and they can begin their evolution to the higher forms of life in the IT ecosystem.

An Heirloom Comes Home

A Texas man is celebrating the return of a family heirloom that was stolen a decade ago.  The item in question is a nickel plated Colt single action .45, given to his grandfather in 1901.  So in addition to the value of such an antique, there’s the sentimental value of getting your granddad’s gun back.

Apparently someone stole it, and the ATF got a tip that someone was trying to sell it, arrested two goblins, and then returned the gun to the family after the trial was over.*

I’m glad to see a part of this families history returned to it, and I’m glad to see two of the thieves that took it from them going away.  For once, cheers to the ATF.

*I know, I’m shocked too.

Stump Speech

This is a transcript of the speech that Vice-Presidential Candidate DaddyBear gave at the beginning of a town hall meeting held at the community center in Grand Forks, North Dakota.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining me here tonight.  I appreciate all of you making it out to speak with me in the face of weather like this.  Who would have thought there’d be a snow storm in North Dakota in March?  In saying this, I apologize for our campaign manager’s inability to look at a calendar.  Just kidding Harv!  For those of you don’t know him, Harv there at the back of the hall is our campaign manager.  Harv was a Marine sniper, and after the past few months, he’s started getting the thousand yard stare.

Anyway, before we open up the floor to your questions, I’d like to speak about something that’s become kind of a theme for Candidate X and me: The hard right over the easy wrong.

This is something that Candidate X and I learned while we served in our military, but it applies to just about everything we all do every day.  The principle is this:  It is better to choose to do the right thing, no matter how hard or painful it is, than it is to do the easy thing that happens to be the wrong thing to do.

Examples of this include choosing to save up money to buy a new refrigerator instead of putting one on credit and paying usurous levels of interest on it.  It could mean choosing to take hard sciences and engineering courses in college rather than getting a liberal arts degree so that when you graduate you are more likely to get that high paying job we all aspire to.

It can also mean living on what most Americans would consider a shoe-string budget in order to live within your means, even after you get that job with the big bucks, and save up enough money so that when bad things happen, you can stand on your own two feet.

In the military, one way that this was expressed was a tradition we had in the order in which our soldiers ate.  The lowest ranking soldier eats first, followed by the next up in rank, and so on until the unit commander eats last.  I was taught that this came out of a problem during World War I, where sometimes not enough food would be sent up to the front lines for everyone to eat as much as they wanted to, so some leaders were making sure they got their fill before allowing the lower soldiers access to the food.  What ended up happening was that the privates on the sticky end of the stick ended up not getting much to eat, or sometimes nothing at all, while the officers and senior NCO’s got their fill.  If you flip that and put the needs of your subordinates first, then you eat last, but you’ll make damn sure that there’s enough food for everyone.  It only takes a couple of times for a commander to eat half a cup of scraps before he starts raising hell to get more food sent up.

So that’s the hard right over the easy wrong.  You choose to do something that might be unpleasant because it is right, even though it might be much harder to do than doing the wrong thing, or doing nothing.

We bring this up because our country has been choosing the easy wrong for far too long in a lot of things.

  • Got poor people in your country?  It’s too hard to educate them so that they can compete for good jobs and to encourage industries that will employ them and pay them a days wage for a days work.  We’ll just print money and give them free stuff so they won’t have an incentive to get that education or find that good job.  
  • Got some gold plated piece of military hardware that you think you need, but if you’re honest, you’ll admit that you really just want it because it’s sexier than buying better rifles, or uniforms, or trucks, or ships, or fighter planes for your servicemembers that are an evolution of existing stuff?  Then make sure you spread the design and manufacturing around the country to get congressional support and get a fat contract out the door for something that might deliver in a decade.  It’s too hard to just replace and incrementally upgrade existing hardware, and besides, there’s not as much money in that.
  • Have companies that didn’t do the right thing, got themselves in a whole mess of trouble financially, and now are threatening to throw thousands of voters out of work just prior to an election?  Easy, just put the full faith and credit of the nation behind a select group of companies in order to make sure the factories and banks stay open, and we’ll figure out how to pay for it when the grandkids start paying taxes.  It’s too hard to look a CEO in the eye, call them a fool, and let the economy and the market figure it out.

What we’re saying is that we’ve been doing the wrong thing because it’s easier than taking our medicine and doing the right thing for so long that now all of the bills are coming due and we can’t pay them.  Our government’s debt is skyrocketing, and it will take decades to climb out of the hole it took decades for us to dig, even if we start now.

Ladies and gentlemen, it’s time for the grown-ups to take over again in America.  It’s time we got out of bed, looked ourselves in the mirror, admitted we can’t go on like this, and got on with the business of righting our countries financial ship.

We need to cut our spending as deeply and responsibly as we can.  We need to look at each and every line in the federal budget, assuming that we can get one in Congress this year, and not ask “Why should I cut this?” but rather “Will the country fail if I cut this?”.  If the answer to that question is No, then it needs to be taken out.  We need to be honest with ourselves about the limits of our ability to pay for everyone else on the planet, including our own able-bodied citizens.  We need to go back to the basics of government, and get rid of all the luxuries we’ve strapped onto the back of taxpayers since the Roosevelt administration.  We need to return the powers and responsibilities that the federal government has assumed to the state and local authorities wherever we can, and let them figure out how to do things in a way that works for their particular needs.

It’s not going to be easy, and it’s probably not going to be a lot of fun.  But it’s the right thing to do, and if any country can do it, it’s ours.  We draw from the traditions, cultures, and ideas of every country on the planet when we try to find solutions.  We are not beholden to centuries of “That’s just the way we do it here” inertial thinking, at least not yet.  If we don’t do it soon, we run the risk of losing our ability to remember that there is a better way, and we have the ability, the right, and the responsibility to change.

Thank you for your patience and your time.  Let’s switch this over to the question and answer part of this shindig.  And just to answer the questions that always seem to be come up at these things, let me just say these things to begin with:

  1. Dressing right
  2. On my right hip, at about 3:30
  3. 1911
  4. .45 ACP
  5. Minnesota Vikings or Washington Redskins
  6. I don’t like the designated hitter
  7. Like I like my women:  Strong and Sweet

So, what are your questions?

Gunnie Google Doodle

Today is the anniversary of the birth of Marie Curie, and Google has honored her memory by giving her her own Doodle.

There have been other custom Doodles, as Google calls it when they modify their page logo to something for a special occasion.  There have been pictures of famous people, animations, and even games.

But what about a Gunnie Doodle?

The birthday of John Moses Browning (PBUH) is coming up in January.  What if there was an animated Google Doodle for this event?

In my mind’s eye, I see something kind of like this starting up when you go to Google for a search on the anniversary of JMB’s birth.

I know, I’m never going to see it.  “Don’t be evil” includes not acknowledging firearms or gun rights in any way that doesn’t make Google money, but a guy can dream.

What do you all think would make a good Doodle for Google to celebrate something gun related?   Maybe a picture of a DC gun permit for the anniversary of Heller?

Thoughts on the Weekend

  • Difference between a 13 year old girl and a 16 year old boy:  The 13 year old girl argued that $10 was too much to rake up a yard worth of leaves and run them through the Leaf Hog.  The 16 year old boy, three years ago, argued that he wanted $20 or more to do half the work.
  • Tallies for the weekend – 16 large bags of mulched up leaves for the garden beds, 4 large trash barrels of assorted other yard waste for pickup, 1 and 1/2 trash barrels of crap that needs to be hauled off.  Add to that 1 large bag of composted manure and a bale of peat moss hauled to the garden and mixed in.
  • Note to self – Measure the height of the area you want to put in a set of 7 foot steel shelves in the basement before purchasing them.  
  • Further note to self – Considering re-routing ductwork in the basement due to a desire to put in 7 foot shelves in a 6 and 1/2 foot space is a sign of mental illness.
  • Proud moment of the weekend – Girlie Bear goes over to the neighbor with the new baby and asks if the baby is taking a nap because she needs to run the leaf blower and lawn mower and doesn’t want to wake the child.
  • Watching two 3 year olds play in a battery operated jeep and a sandbox could be material for an anthropological paper worthy of Jane Goodall.
  • Girlie Bear and Little Bear’s mother is my ex-wife for a reason.
  • I need to do an inventory of my ammunition and get it organized.  I kept finding boxes of .22 this weekend that I vaguely remember buying.
  • Girlie Bear and I got drawn to hunt at Fort Knox again this year, but it’s in a completely different area.  Going to have to do a bit of scouting.

Today’s Earworm

In honor of the couple who got picked up for stealing a car to have a little tryst, I give you this:

News Roundup

  • From the “Bad Idea” Department – The state courts system in California is considering whether or not to accept a $20 million donation from the owner of the L.A. Lakers and a health care company to stimulate work on a new computer system.  If the words “conflict of interest” just came into your mind, you earn a gold star.  Taking private money to do something for the supposedly neutral courts can create the perception of bias towards this man and his businesses when, not if, he’s sued.
  • From the “Sense of Entitlement” Department – A member of the Occupy Wall Street movement decided that being told his Big Mac wasn’t going to be on the house was a good excuse to throw part of a cash register at the restaurant’s staff.  Apparently this particular fast food place has become a good place to use the restroom for members of the protest group.  So I’m guessing that the employees have been having to spend quite a bit more time cleaning said facilities, and the owner of the place has had to pay their wages and buy the supplies to do it.  In return, this young person decided to beg for free food, and then assaulted the staff when rebuffed.  Yeah, I’d be hiring an armed guard to make sure only paying customers use the restroom from now on.  Remember kids, no good deed goes unpunished.
  • From the “Scratching an Itch” Department – An overly amorous couple in Florida has been arrested after stealing an unmarked police car in order to have sex in it.  According to police, the male in question feels no remorse at his actions because he was in a hurry to jump in the sack with the young lady.  Guys, no matter how good looking or willing she is, she’s not worth an arrest record.  Ladies, no man is good looking, rich, or a smooth enough talker to rate getting a pair of steel bracelets.  Maybe I’m just too old, but stealing a car in order to have a place for a roll in the hay sounds like a bad idea.  Then again, I was young and stupid once, so who am I to say?

Thought for the Day

Wiley Miller over at Non Sequitur hits one out of the park with this one:

Update – Looks like Ruth beat me to it!

Quiz on Second Amendment Knowledge

The Christian Science Monitor has posted up a quiz on general knowledge of the Second Amendment and gun rights in general.  It’s pretty high level, but I think it’s a pretty good place to do a check on your overall knowledge.  And yeah, you can argue about some of the “why did this happen” and “what does this mean?” questions, but that’s what we’ve been doing in the courts and on the gun sites since I can remember.

I scored 10 out of 12, missing two questions about NFA 34.  Guess I know where I need to study up.

How did y’all do?