• Archives

  • Topics

  • Meta

  • The Boogeyman - Working Vacation
  • Coming Home
  • Via Serica

30 Days of Reagan – Day 20

And we are especially not going to tolerate these attacks from outlaw states run by the strangest collection of misfits, Looney Tunes and squalid criminals since the advent of the Third Reich […] There can be no place on earth where it is safe for these monsters to rest,or train or practice their cruel and deadly. We must act together – or unilaterally, if necessary – to ensure that these terrorists have no sanctuary, anywhere.”

My Take – President Reagan said these words in reference to rogue states such as Libya and North Korea, but his words 16 years before September 11 were prophetic, but ignored by succeeding administrations.  Those who want to bring the craziness of the rest of the world to our shores need to know that our reaction will be fast, violent and brutal.  We also need to be proactive to find and eliminate threats before they reach our shore.  That’s why I support a reduction of our foreign involvement, but not a complete dismantlement of our world-wide defense strategy.

Today’s Earworm

I’m not normally a big fan of blondes, but for Faith Hill, I’ll make an exception.

News Roundup

  • From the “Gangster Guns” Department – Two guns formerly owned by the notorious Bonnie Parker and Clyde Barrow were recently auctioned in Kansas City.  The Thompson submachine gun and Winchester shotgun sold for $210,000.  I hope the new owner is a young person, because by the time the ATF OK’s the transfer of the machine gun, they’re going to be antiques themselves.
  • From the “No Kidding?” Department – The captain of the Italian cruise ship that ran aground after hitting a rock has admitted that he “messed up”.  Remember, this is the guy who ran his ship into an island, got off the boat as fast as he could, then argued with rescue coordinators as to whether or not he should return to his ship and assist in rescue efforts.   Son, “messed up” is what I call it when I put caramel flavored creamer in my coffee when I meant to put in un-flavored.  What you did can best be described as “poking the pooch”, “stepping on your schwanz”, or “biting the big one”.  I wonder how you say “soup sandwich” in Italian?
  • From the “Performing as Planned” Department – A TSA agent and his wife have been charged with theft after investigators discovered that the agent was putting pilfered belongings from travelers in a pocket that had been sewn into his uniform.  For those of you who are keeping track, this one goes in the ever-increasing “Breaking the Law and Violating People’s Rights” column of your scorecard, while the “Catching Terrorists” column should add up to precisely “diddly” over “squat”.
  • From the “Hole in my Head” Department – A man in Illinois walked around for several days with a 3 1/2 inch nail in his head.  He took a knock to the noggin with a nail gun, thought the nail had missed, and went about his business.  I can sympathize with him.  I once walked around for a couple of days with a piece of buckshot in my hand before noticing that my left hand was turning funny colors and changing shape.  Some would call that a high pain tolerance.  However, the official report from the emergency room probably included the term “not too bright”.

30 Days of Reagan – Day 19

Blood that has soaked into the sands of a beach is all of one color. America stands unique in the world: the only country not founded on race but on a way, an ideal. Not in spite of but because of our polyglot background, we have had all the strength in the world. That is the American way.

Thought for the Day

It is by Browning alone that I set lead in motion.  It is by the squeezing of the trigger that the hammer comes forward, the primer becomes flame, the powder becomes gas.  It is by Browning alone that I set lead in motion. 

Sigh

I have to make an announcement:  I am going to vote for Ron Paul in the Kentucky Republican primary.  I’m not going to be voting for Paul because I like him.  I came to this decision in a process of elimination, and Paul was the only one I can’t discard:

  • Newt Gingrich:  I’m as flawed a human being as you can get, but I can’t vote for a serial adulterer who didn’t flee Washington like his hair was on fire after he wasn’t re-elected.  Yes, I’m making a subjective and probably unfair judgement call about someones character based on what I know about his personal life.  But to be fair, I did the same thing to Bill Clinton, Gingrich’s nemesis.  He’s a great debater, or at least a combative one who would make Obama work for it, but I’ve never seen anything from him that tells me he’d be able to lead the country. 
  • Rick Santorum:  Seems like a good guy, but after the things I’ve heard him say about gay people and their ability to marry, I can’t support him.  A president can’t be choosy about whose rights he holds dear.  I always say that if the rights of one of us are violated, then the rights of all of us are violated, and I believe that if I as a twice-divorced heterosexual man can choose whatever other human being I want to be with (hopefully) the rest of my life, then every other citizen, gay or straight, should be able to do that too.  Look at it this way, if he was saying “I love guns, just not those guns” instead of “I love marriage, just not those marriages” would you vote for him?
  • Mitt Romney –  Do I believe that Romney will be Obama light?  Actually, I’ve come away from that.  Romney isn’t a wannabe socialist.  I see Romney as a political chameleon who will try to govern through consensus rather than fight for what he believes is right.  He will compromise base principles in order to say he’s accomplished something, even if it’s counter to the philosophy of the people who elected him, and therefore I won’t vote for him. 

So I come to Ron Paul.  Now, I like a lot of what Dr. Paul has to say about domestic policy, but I have problems with his foreign policy stance.  I’m all for reducing our foreign military involvement, but I think he wants to cut too close to the bone.  I also know that what a candidate promises on the campaign trail, what a sitting president tries to do in concert with the Congress, and what actually happens in the end are three very different things, so maybe my concerns aren’t that big a deal.

Do I think he has much of a chance of getting elected?  I have no idea.  Obama would be able to paint him as an extremist kook, but he would be able to re-energize the Tea Party movement.  If he chose a conservative running mate, he might have a shot.

However, none of the Republicans are the kind of candidate and leader who you can look at and say “He will beat Obama”.  Gingrich and Santorum will bring the nutroots out of the woodwork, and Romney is the opponent that Obama wants and he won’t get the Republicans to the polls. 

So I’ll cast my vote in the primary, try to get excited over the summer, and consider third party voting in November.  I’m seriously beginning to think that it would be better for Obama to have the White House with a Republican Congress than for any of these four to have a compliant Republican Congress.

30 Days of Reagan – Day 18

The ten most dangerous words in the English language are “Hi, I’m from the government, and I’m here to help.”

Blogs Roundup

  • Robb does a review of a holster maker in my neck of the woods.  I’ll have to stop by and give his wares a look.
  • Flier389 relates a great story of an encounter he had with a mama bear and her cubs once upon a time.
  • Mr.G’s has a great write up on gun control and how it seeks to make slaves of free men.
  • Warning, this post from Auntie J. is sweet enough to make you adjust your insulin.
  • TinCan Assassin is going to have a lot of fun raising his daughter.  The force is strong with this one.  
  • Shepherd K. has good news about his new little one, and learns the parent’s lesson of “If you build it, they will spew upon it”.  I would have commented with some words of encouragement, but didn’t see a comment link.
  • DefenseTech has a quick write-up on a concept design for a stealthy military cargo plane.  Looks neat, but my totally non-flying self has to ask why you would need a fleet of cargo aircraft to replace the C-5 that use technology designed to make bombers survivable over an area defended by a sophisticated anti-air infrastructure.  I could see having a few for dropping supplies behind the lines or dropping in paratroopers covertly, though.
  • Big Hollywood is reporting that some of the big Obama contributors in Hollywood are pulling their support of the President after he came out against SOPA and PIPA.  Gee, that’s too bad.

Thoughts on the Evening

  • I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again:  It’s better to be shot and lay on the ground for an hour than it is to be captured, flex-cuffed, and questioned.
  • Apparently the United States military is recruiting rhinos now.  One of them powerslammed me when I was uncooperative about being flex-cuffed.
  • Note to self:  When being questioned and you are asked what you do for a living, telling the interrogator “I used to be a soldier until I took an arrow to the knee” might be very funny, but it will not endear you to said interrogator.

Maddening Linguistics Question

OK, this is making my brain itch, and I need your help.

I’m an upper Mid-West transplant, so Southernisms sometimes don’t work for me.

My question to the crowd:

When referring to the set of furniture in a given room, is it a “suite” or “suit”?

Example:

“We went to the store the other day and bought a new bedroom suit”

My mind says it’s “suite”.  But four different Kentucky people, including my lovely and long-suffering wife, say “suit”.

Also, when referring to the little shelf that sits at the base of a window, is it a “sill” or “seal”?  Again, several Kentucky people use “seal”, while I’ve always said “sill”.

Please help.  It’s making my head hurt.