• Archives

  • Topics

  • Meta

  • The Boogeyman - Working Vacation
  • Coming Home
  • Via Serica

A Message

Recently, Mitt Romney made an off the cuff remark about the socio-economic circumstances and motivations of Obama supporters. He claimed that a lot of them don’t pay income taxes, and they have become dependent on the government for the necessities of life. Not surprisingly, the press is skewering him.

We here at the DaddyBear 2012 campaign would like to voice our opinion on this issue:

If you are dependent on the hard working people of this country to make sure you don’t starve to death or lie frozen to the gutter, but are capable of earning your keep and don’t want that to change, then I don’t want your vote. That’s not to say that if I am elected, I won’t work in your best interest, because I will. It’s just that I believe that a kick in the ass and going cold turkey off of that sweet welfare money is in your best interest.

If, on the other hand, you believe that charity shouldn’t happen because men with guns make you do it, I would appreciate your support. If you believe that those who do not work should not eat, please vote for me.

Thank you, and God bless America, or at least forgive us for the last four years.

Unclear on the Concept of “Veteran”

General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has expressed an opinion that the recent internet movie released by a group comprised of former members of the intelligence services and special operations forces is not “useful”.  He also said that he believes that the military should be apolitical, and that by coming out against the president, these people endanger the trust the American people have in their military.

With all due respect to General Dempsey’s service and position, as a proud veteran, he can take his opinions, fold them until they’re all corners, and then hide them somewhere distasteful.

I do agree that military personnel should not use their affiliation with the military to help any political cause, and I support regulations that forbid soldiers from criticizing the civilian leadership while on active duty.  The soldier who got on stage with Ron Paul in uniform was wrong.  An officer or NCO who trash talks the President in such a way that brings discredit to the armed services or gives the appearance that the military either supports or opposes any given administration or policy deserves to be punished.

But once you take off the uniform, either as a reservist going back to every day life or as a veteran who is hanging up the uniform, those restrictions loosen.  While I still don’t support wearing a uniform at political events, any other legal activity by a veteran, including vociferously and effectively rebutting the president, any president, is fine by me.

You see, those who have worn the uniform can have a unique perspective on the events of the day.  If you’ve seen true poverty in Haiti, you might have some thoughts on the ‘poor’ here at home. If you’ve seen the waste and fraud that the bloated federal bureaucracy creates and enjoys, then you might be a good candidate for someone with a valid opinion on how to cut and clean up the government.  And yes, once you’ve worn the uniform, if you choose to oppose the foreign policy and war plans of the United States, that is your right, although your right to protest doesn’t protect you from derision if your tactics include casting unwarranted aspersions on the integrity and honor of those you served with or those still serving.

We veterans who participate in and comment on politics are following a great American tradition.  We have had 24 presidents who have worn the uniform, and many of them were combat veterans.  Was our country done a disservice because these veterans chose to become part of the political process once they hung up the uniform?  Many of our best journalists, the part of our society that is supposed to be keeping the government honest by throwing a little sunshine on that which it wants to hide in the dark, have been veterans.  Should they be silenced because their voices make the political leadership uncomfortable?

General Dempsey, the phrase that keeps running through my mind is “Stay in your lane”.  Your mission is to provide leadership to our soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines, and to provide advice to the President.  You seem to be quite adept at that, and I thank you for your efforts.  But those of us who no longer fall under your perview have a right and a responsibility to speak our minds and call out the government when it does wrong.  Our opinions and our voices are no longer in your lane.  If you want to keep the active military from becoming politicized, then stop using the press to defend the President and his policies.  That is also outside of your lane.

The fact that those who served the country were the instruments of political policy makes us sensitive to the outrages of that policy, and we have much to bring to the table once we close that chapter of our life.  We are no longer bound by the regulations and traditions that kept us out of the political arena, we are locked and loaded, and we are watching our lanes.

 

Everyone Settle Down

On Saturday, Mitt Romney announced his choice of running mate, Wisconsin Representative Paul Ryan.  Ryan is one of the bright lights of the current conservative movement, and brings Romney’s campaign some street cred with people who sympathize with the Tea Party wing of the Republican Party.  He’s an economics and budget wonk, a sixteenth level blackbelt in debating and arguing, and is about as clean cut and apple pie as they come.

Republicans were audibly swooning about 18 seconds after the announcement, which was precisely 37 seconds faster than the first attack ad being issued by the Democrats.  Apparently, depending on who you ask, Ryan is either the second coming of Ronaldus Maximus or the embodiment of all that is evil and hateful in humanity.

My response to the announcement and ensuing orgy of hopes, dreams, and doom?  Meh.

Look, I like what Congressman Ryan has said and done so far.  I respect the fact that he seems to be able to effectively refute the administration’s propaganda with facts instead of emotions and rhetoric.  He has experience in the real world, but isn’t a neophyte in government. He certainly wasn’t born with a silver spoon in his mouth, but neither was he taught to speak so that he could recite The Internationale to his mother’s commie friends.  In short, he seems to be a good man who I agree with on quite a few things.  If he were running for president, I would certainly consider voting for him.

But he’s not running for president.  He’s the second name on the ticket, and no matter how much of a partner Mr. Romney makes him in his administration, assuming he wins the election, he will just be an advisor to a man who displays the libertarian leanings of my 11 year old labrador retriever.  Maybe he’ll be a moderating influence on Romney’s instincts to get along with the Democrats at all costs, and maybe he’ll be shut away in a nice office waiting for the next state funeral to happen so he’ll have something to do.  At this point, no-one can tell.

Unless Romney changes his tune and starts articulating plans to start dismantling not only the damage done by the Obama administration but also by the past few decades in a rather drastic fashion, he could name zombie Reagan as his running mate and not win the election.  He has to prove that he’s more than Diet Obama, and no person on his ticket or in his projected cabinet is going to change that.

Well, Why the Heck Not?

I’d like to say that I was surprised to read that the genocidal regime of Sudan is being elected to the Human Rights Council at the United Nations, but I can’t.  The U.N. has long been a debate club for dictators and murdering kleptocrats, and my shocked face is starting to cramp up after years of watching its shenanigans.  Honestly, the election of any bad actor to a place of power and prestige at the U.N. fails to surprise me anymore.

But really, what’s next?  If you’re going to put a government whose leader has been indicted for war crimes and crimes against humanity on the U.N. board that looks after human rights, where do you draw the line?

  • Is Jerry Sandusky going to be given a high level position at UNICEF?
  • Is the Lord’s Resistance Army going to be given a place at the table on the commission that is looking into the problem of child soldiers?
  • Are the geniuses at the U.N going to put Bill Clinton and Larry Flint on a woman’s rights committee?
  • Maybe Paul Helmke could be a voting member of the committee trying to draft the next small arms treaty?
  • How about we get Michael Vick on the job to advise the animal welfare working group?
  • You know, Ben Bernanke would make a perfect chairman for the fiscal reform commission.

If any of these questions offended you or you think I’m using hyperbole, congratulations, you’re doing it right.  All of these are indeed ridiculous and a bit offensive, but so is putting a dictator, who used gangs of men to ethnically cleanse his country through rape and murder, on a human rights commission.

Honestly, if the African states want to get one of their own on the human rights commission, then couldn’t they have come up with a better candidate?  Is there no regime on the entire continent with a decent human rights record, or at least doesn’t have its dictator up on warrants from the I.C.C?

Cold Calculus

On August 6, 1945, a lone B-29 of the American Army Air Force dropped a uranium fueled atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima.  Thousands of people died both in the immediate bombing and in the months to follow.  President Truman hoped to use the destruction of Hiroshima to convince the Japanese government that continued resistance would only lead to untold suffering by the Japanese people, as well as the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Allied soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen in the inevitable invasion of the Japanese main islands.

The first attempt failed in that regard, so a second bombing happened at Nagasaki on August 8.  Another city was annhilated and its population was decimated, which led to the surrender of Japanese forces on August 15.

Ever since, we have been debating the decision to kill so many people using such a terrible weapon.  The cold calculus of millions of dead and wounded in an invasion versus the death and suffering of hundreds of thousands may make sense, but it only brings home to me that in a total war, there are few truly moral options open to leaders.  Every decision leads to someone suffering; the trick is to choose the one with the least amount of death and pain.

Those who want to cast the bombing of Japan as an evil act by immoral men need to study their own history.  Truman was given no good options, a situation every leader faces at one time or another.  Few decisions are as momentous as whether or not to utilize the most destructive weapons in history, but they are all important.  A leader who refuses to take the best of a set of bad options is not a leader, he is a pretender.

Penalized Pastor

A man in Arizona, who is an ordained minister in the Church of God in Christ, is in jail after authorities claim he violated probation conditions set when he was arrested for holding worship and bible study meetings at his home.  Authorities claim that the issue is not that he was holding services, but that the building he was doing it in was not up to code.  He continues his ministry in jail, and is giving no indication that he plans to stop when he is released.

Here’s my opinion on this:

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The good pastor might be using questionable judgement about the size of the groups he worships with and the facility he is using, but to be honest, the city and state are out of line on this one.  This is one of those things which they ought to stay the heck out of  until someone gets hurt.  Preemptively trying to shut him down, even if their intentions are purely safety oriented, is colored by a perception that they are shutting down the peaceful gathering of citizens to worship because they don’t agree with it.

Phoenix, you can’t win this one.  You all ought to drop it.

Don’t You Dare

Against my own better judgement, I signed up for Facebook a while ago.  It took my wife, several family members, and a plethora of friends to convince me that I needed to “connect” with everyone.  To be honest, it’s been a good place to exchange pictures of the kids and exchange pithy but non-consequential comments.  I’ve refrained from using it to play games and annoy people, but I’m aware of the many applications available.

I’ve also restricted the amount of information I give Facebook, because a wise man once told me that if I’m not paying to use a service, then I’m not the customer, I’m the product.

But you do have to give a few things, like name and location.  I gave those so that family would be able to find me on the service, but now I’m starting to regret not doing a bit of fibbing.

You see, in their infinite wisdom, Facebook is allowing a company to mine the information on Facebook so that the Democratic Party can figure out who they can bother looking for donations.  The way it works appears to be that people can allow the company to download their list of ‘friends’ and their locations, compare that list to the list of people already donating to the party, then hit the ones with more sense than to give money to the Democrats up for a donation.

So, let me say this:  Don’t any of you individuals with a sick sense of humor even consider it.  I swear, if I get a single phone call from a Democratic operative looking for me to open my wallet, I will find out who clued them to my existence, and I will find you.  You’ll be lucky if I just get you drunk and leave you naked and penniless in Tegucigalpa.  If I’m feeling charitable, I might not write “Your mother’s a whore” in Spanish on your forehead before I leave you in that drainage ditch.

What would induce someone to give their list of friends to a political spammer?  Just when I think I can’t be surprised anymore, this kind of thing climbs out of the sewer of slime to kick me in the butt.

Shark, Motorcycle, Some Assembly Required

Michael Bloomberg, mayor of New York City and expert on ancient Egyptian septic tank spelunking, has decided to wake the sleeping bear by decreeing that his health department shall henceforth make it harder for new mothers to feed their children.  He apparently has an issue with baby formula, and has directed that hospitals must lock it up with the Oxycontin.  In addition, when a new mother chooses to give formula to her baby, she will have to go through a lecture on breast-feeding each and every time she has the impertinence to make an independent decision about the nutrition of her child.

I look forward to seeing Mayor Bloomberg burned in effigy by the same women who chant “My body, my choice!” in front of the Supreme Court building every time someone mentions abortion or birth control in the political square.  If it’s a woman’s choice on whether to use birth control or carry a baby at all, it should be her choice on what she will feed that child so long as no harm comes to the child because of it.  Yeah, you can overfeed a child on formula, and it’s probably not as good for the baby as breastfeeding, but it’s not beer with a cigarette butt soaking in it either.

Will we see public browbeating by the mayor over what mothers choose to feed babies?  Will he make grand speeches about smuggled formula from other states with lax powdered milk laws?  Will he send agents into Walmarts in Virginia and Tennessee to see if they can successfully convince the clerk to sell them Enfamil?

This is yet another in a long list of things that Bloomberg has stuck his nose into where he had no business.  Smoking, trans-fats, guns, and drink sizes are just the examples I can think of off the top of my head.  He’s doing it for our own good, I’m sure, but someone needs to have the following conversation with him:

Bloomberg – And sunblock!  We have to shame people into taking sunblock showers every morning before they leave the house!  And we have to make employers provide free sunblock to their employees!

Interventionist – Mike, seriously, please put down the megaphone.  We’re all right here, for the love of God.  OK, thank you.  Now, we have to talk.

Bloomberg – About what?  Pet food?  I was thinking we ought to run all of the pet food vendors out of the city and force the people to feed their dogs rice and their cats Rice Krispies.  That way the cholesterol of the cities pets will plummet, and we won’t have so many dead animals raining down from the skyscrapers.

Interventionist – Sigh.  Listen, Mike, you have to stop.  You have a problem.  You’re addicted to controlling the details of other people’s lives.  It’s a common problem, but you’re an extreme example of a busybody.  What’s next, telling people what they have to wear?

Bloomberg – That’s right!  All men must wear knee-high lace-up patent leather boots so they have all the ankle support they could ever need!  Women will either have to wear sandals or 8 inch heels, depending on what the health department works best for them!  And everyone has to wear purple shirts on even days and red shirts on odd days!

Interventionist – My Lord, it’s worse than I thought.  Mike, these men are here to help you.  They’re going to take you to a nice quiet place where you can get your head together, and hopefully in a little while you’ll be able to come back and be whole.

Bloomberg – What?  But what about my plans to make all people in the city over six feet in height walk around on their knees to even out the height gap?  Or making kids drink from the Hudson to improve their immune systems after they’ve had immunizations for bubonic plague and South American laughing sickness?

Interventionist, walking away as the mayor is gently guided to the back of his limousine for a drive to a ‘country retreat’ – I hope this works.  If it doesn’t, he’s likely to come back and change the law so that he can get re-elected again, and I fear the city couldn’t survive that.

Sad Pandas

Schadenfreude – (n) The pleasure felt at the misfortunes of others.

The Palestinians, also known as the people who have failed to effectively fight for either the land they occupy and the land they want for at least three generations, are expressing outrage over Mitt Romney’s statements during his recent trip to Israel.  Mr. Romney stated his opinion that Jerusalem is Israel’s capitol and that there is a cultural reason why the gap between Israel’s GDP and that of the Palestinians.  First and foremost, Israel has controlled all of Jerusalem since before I was born.   If they were going to give it back, it would have already happened, and if the Palestinians have the ability to make them do it, they haven’t demonstrated it yet.  Yes, they can protest and bomb pizza parlors, maybe even lob a volley of rockets into neighborhoods stocked full of children and old people, but they aren’t going to be able to militarily push Israel across the street, much less out of Jerusalem.  Second, I am tired of hearing the whining about how the Israelis restrict the Palestinians and so that oppressed people must live in squalor.  The Israelis put restrictions on some aspects of the Palestinians because the Palestinians have this remarkable habit of exploiting every way the Israelis leave them alone to sneak murderers into Israel to kill grandmothers.  Want us to take you seriously and improve your lot in life?  Quit acting like a bunch of whining twits and make life better for your children.  Want me to give two hoots about the “plight” of the “Palestinian people”?  Bring back the Americans they’ve killed and harmed in the last 40 years through their legacy of terrorism.  Until then, cry me a river.

Next, we have United Nations General Secretary Ban ki Moon, who has a sad because the United Nations was unable to come to agreement on an international gun control treaty that would have been an excuse for tinpot dictators to continue to oppress an unarmed populace and for President Obama to act more like a tinpot dictator.  How sad that such enlightened countries as China, Iran, and Russia won’t be able to dictate the manner in which free people defend themselves or provide aid to their allies.  Just to show my solidarity with those who mourn this loss, I pledge to take only guns that were produced overseas to my next range trip and to shoot only fine imported ammunition.

You know, today started off pretty bad for me, but reading these put a smile on my face and a spring in my step.

An Open Letter

Dear President Obama,

Like you and most other Americans, I was shocked and saddened by the recent massacre at the movie theater in Aurora, Colorado.  I hope that the wheels of justice grind very finely upon the perpetrator of this atrocity.

I know it must have been difficult for you to not add your voice to the immediate calls for additional restrictions on gun rights, and I guess it must have become too much for you to resist.  I read this morning that you are making noises about pushing for restrictions on modern sporting rifles and carbines, or as you call them “assault weapons”.

I won’t go into the technical reasons that most civilians can’t and don’t own an “assault rifle”.  I will point out that the AR-15 pattern rifle has become one of the most popular guns in the United States, and an entire industry has popped up for creating accessories to use with them.  If you want to try bailing out the ocean with a spoon, that’s your business.

I do want to thank you for making up my mind.  I have resisted purchasing a modern carbine for my own use due to some personal reasons.  But to be honest, if you’re going to be ignorant enough to try to outlaw them, I’m going to make it my personal goal to own one of each model of weapon you are talking about outlawing.  I may not start with an AR-15 or an AK-47 clone, but I will work my way up to them.

Since I don’t own much ammunition in the calibers used by these carbines and rifles, I will have to start stocking up.  Just to add insult to injury, I will purchase as much of it as I can in bulk and on-line.  A penny saved is a penny earned, as a wise man once said, and every cent I save in ammunition is a cent I can put toward buying another gun.

Again, I, my local gun dealers, and the American gun industry thank you for helping me and thousands of other people make this important decision.  Even if you are just pandering to your support base, you’re the best booster the gun industry has had in generations.

Sincerely,

 

Daddy J. Bear

Louisville Kentucky