• Archives

  • Topics

  • Meta

  • The Boogeyman - Working Vacation
  • Coming Home
  • Via Serica

Best Speech I’ve Heard In A Long Time

Presented without comment.

H/T to Kevin.

Theory

I was discussing some of the places I’ve been, especially when I was in the military, with a friend over the weekend.  His son is considering joining the military, and the recruiters are doing their kabuki dance about the wonderful places he could be stationed.  He wanted the straight skinny, and I gave him my (somewhat dated) experiences and opinions.

Then something occurred to me.

I’ve always had an idea about how the services decide where to put bases:  The Army and Marine Corps seem to put their posts in the worst places they can find, while the Navy and Air Force pick places that are nice, fun, and close to something worth going to.

Here’s a short list of the military posts I was deployed, stationed, or TDY to:

Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri – Army
Presidio of Monterey, California – Army, but really joint
Goodfellow Air Force Base – Air Force, but really joint
Augsburg, Germany – Army
Fort Huachuca, Arizona – Army
Fort Hood, Texas – Army
Fort Bragg, North Carolina – Army
Fort Irwin, California – Army
Fort Lewis, Washington – Army
Fort Drum, New York – Army
Macdill Air Force Base, Florida – Air Force
Norfolk, Virginia – Navy
Fort Meade, Maryland – Army, sort of
Cherry Point, North Carolina – Marines
Naples, Italy – Navy
Stuttgart, Germany – Joint
Berlin, Germany – Army
Frankfurt, Germany – Army
Camp Red Cloud, Korea – Army
Munich, Germany – Joint
RAF Mildenhall, UK – Air Force
Washington DC – Joint
Tuzla, Bosnia – Army
Taszar, Hungary – Army
Misawa, Japan – Air Force

There are a lot more, but those are the big ones.

I see a bit of a pattern.  The Air Force and Navy bases are where they need to be, but tend to be in relatively nice places.  The joint postings are usually almost as nice.  Also, overseas posts tend to be OK, with the exception of Tuzla and CRC.  Then we get to the domestic Marine and Army posts.  To be charitable, they tend to be crapholes.  It’s like in the 1930’s and 1940’s the leadership took a look at a map of the continental United States and sprinkled Army posts and Marine bases in the most economically depressed and isolated areas.  Other than Goodfellow AFB, the Air Force bases all seemed to be good places to take a vacation or raise kids.  Even Norfolk, with all its warts, is better than Bragg or Cherry Point.

Do you veterans concur?  Did the Army and Marine generals put their posts in places that would make their troops hard, or at least pissed off,  and the Air Force and Navy put bases in places where their people would be happy?

A Damn Shame

Vietnamese officials are reporting that two people have been killed and two more injured when a Vietnam-war era artillery shell exploded.  Apparently, one of the deceased was trying to collect it so that it could be sold as scrap when it went off.

This is one of the sad byproducts of warfare – unexploded ordnance or UXO.  Places like Angola, Afghanistan, Bosnia, and Vietnam are going to be reporting similar tragedies for a long time.  Heck, every so often we hear of a farmer in France digging up a shell from World War I, and some German and British cities are still finding large aerial bombs from World War II.  There’s no telling how long the millions of more modern American and Soviet munitions that have been fired around the world in the past 60 years will remain dangerous.

This is one of the reasons that I truly believe that the revolution in more precise munitions is a wonderful thing.  Not only is collateral damage minimized by dropping fewer, more precise bombs and artillery shells, but fewer rounds means fewer duds, which means less UXO left behind to kill the grandchildren of the people fighting the war.

It’s much better to fire one or two terminally guided artillery shells at a target than it is to have an entire battery drop multiple shells in order to make sure you hit the same target.  First, it’s safer for those close to the target, and second it’s less likely that a dud will be fired and forgotten.  If you’re observing an enemy, have a couple of bombs or shells lobbed at them, and one of them hits and sticks, you’re going to report it.  If you drop 25 on them, you probably won’t notice.

And a special prayer goes out every night for the souls who volunteer to go into former war zones to try to find and destroy the forgotten bombs, shells, and mines.  One of the bravest people I ever met was a young Swede who worked with others to clear mine fields with nothing but a flak vest, steel helmet, and a piece of plastic rod in her hand.  Imagine spending days on your knees, poking holes in the earth trying to find something designed to kill someone doing exactly what you are trying to do. Poke the rod down as far as you can reach, pull it out, move over two inches, and do it again.  If you hit something, dig down from an area you’ve already cleared, and see if it’s a rock, a piece of old scrap metal, or a mine.  If it’s a mine, mark it so that the guy with the gun or the explosives can take care of it, and move on.  Makes me stop complaining about having to do TPS reports when I think of that.

Headdesk

A photograph of Air Force personnel posed around a coffin, which contains an airman pretending to be dead, has been circulating around the Internet and is being investigated by the Air Force.

This year’s winner in the “Bad Idea” Category

Now, I’ve got a pretty dark sense of humor.  OK, I’ve got a sense of humor that’s been called “sick and twisted” by those who are qualified to make that assessment.  But even I know that this is pretty poor taste.  And if they didn’t think that whatever dolt got hold of it wouldn’t post it on the Internet, where it would burst into flames and splatter all of them with burning feces, then they’re too dumb to work around airplanes.

Say it with me kids:  If you do stupid crap and take pictures or video of it, you will be found out.

This reminds me of a video I saw once of a defoliant spraying plane in Vietnam which had “Only you can prevent forests” painted on the fuselage.  Funny?  Yes, in a dark and twisted sort of way.  Appropriate?  Maybe, maybe not.  Something you want on the national news?  Not on your life.

Let’s play a game here kids.  We’ll call it “Good idea, bad idea”

  • Taking a group picture – Good Idea
  • Taking a group picture with a coffin in it – Bad Idea
  • Posing in funny  ways in your group picture – Good Idea
  • Posing in funny ways around a guy laying with his eyes closed in a coffin – Bad Idea
  • Taking a picture, in uniform, of a bunch of people posed around a coffin with a guy pretending to be dead in it – What the !#$!@#!$ is wrong with you?!?!?!?!

Also, this is disrespectful to the troops that have come home feet first in these coffins.  What these airmen and NCO’s were thinking, if at all, and what organ they were using to think with, if any, when they came up with this idea and followed through on it is beyond me. 

I hope the Air Force gets to the bottom of this and ‘corrects’ the individuals involved.  But like the man said, you just can’t fix stupid.

Today in History

On December 12, 1985, Airow Air Flight 1285 crashed just after take off from Gander, Newfoundland.  The crash and resulting fire killed 256 people, including 248 soldiers of the 101st Airborne Division.  These soldiers were returning from peacekeeping duty in the Sinai.  Their mission was not one of conquest or nation building.  They placed their lightly armed bodies between two countries that had fought multiple wars so that the Camp David Accords could have time to become a habitual peace instead of a footnote in history.

Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God. — The Gospel of Saint Matthew, Chapter 5, Verse 9

H/T to Blackfive for the reminder.

Covert War With Iran

Fox News is speculating that the United States has been conducting a covert war of intelligence, sabotage, and assassination against Iran.  They point out Stuxnet, the recent loss of a surveillance drone over Iran, explosions at Iranian military and nuclear facilities, and the killings of Iranian scientific and military personnel connected with missile and nuclear weapons research.

Now, I think it’s pretty clear how I feel about Iran.  If we’re in a covert war against them, I see it as an escalation of the war they’ve been fighting against us since 1979.  Iran and the United States have been fighting each other through proxies for 30 years, and now it appears that things might be getting more sticky.

One question though:  Is this campaign, if indeed we are flying surveillance aircraft into Iranian airspace, attacking their infrastructure, and killing their citizens, no matter how justified it is, legal?

Let’s work from the position that we are indeed attacking Iran through non-traditional means.  I’m assuming that President Obama, if not President Bush, gave  permission for such missions to occur.  Does the President have the power to order the military to commit acts of war without an authorization from Congress?  Remember, the power to declare war rests with the legislative branch, not the executive.  If the President is indeed prosecuting a shadow war against Iran, then what piece of legislation can he point to in order to cover his butt?  Not going to argue that Iran has been committing acts of war against us for decades, because they have.  But we hold ourselves to a higher standard than that to which we hold our adversaries.  We are a nation of laws, and the law states that before the President can start a war, he must go to Congress for authorization.

We also have to ask, will blowing up a couple of installations and killing some key personnel be enough to slow down Iran’s weapons programs enough for other means to dissuade them from going down that path?  I guess the question could be posed this way:  Could damaging Oak Ridge and Los Alamos, along with killing Oppenheimer and some of his top scientists and engineers have been enough to prevent the United States from developing the atomic bomb in time for it to be useful against Japan in 1945?

If not, then are we willing to take the next step in order to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them?  Are we willing to move away from low-level sabotage and assassination and send in large formations of troops, ships, and aircraft to either occupy Iran or to damage their capability to do this research to the point where they have to start over from square one?  Is that even possible?

All of this is conjecture, of course.  It’s quite possible that the explosions and deaths in Iran in the past few months have really been accidents that can occur when you do research on high explosives and solid fuel rockets.  You just have to look at our own early attempts to put a rocket into orbit to see how catastrophically things can fail.  Or it could be another country such as Israel that is conducting covert attacks in Iran, and we’re just providing intelligence and other support.

But if the United States truly is conducting a low-level war against Iran, either independently or in concert with other nations, then the President needs to make sure that the representatives of the people are in on the plan and give their legislative approval for it.  He also needs to do a gut check to make sure that if the current strategy, whatever that may be, doesn’t meet the goals set out before committing to violating the sovereignty of another country, then he is willing to either admit defeat and deal with the consequences, or take the attacks to the next level and deal with those consequences.

The Lord Has A Sense Of Humor

A few days ago, I posted about how I didn’t really care for the AR-15. Again, it’s a personal preference, even though I can recognize that an AR can be an excellent choice in firearm for someone who enjoys shooting them.

But the Lord, in his infinite wisdom, has a sense of humor.

Girlie Bear has announced that one of her life goals is to join the Army.  She’s not sure what she wants to do in the Army, but she wants to serve.

I’m proud, of course.  If she follows through, she’ll continue a family tradition that stretches back to our first Irish ancestor who joined the Union army a couple of hours after he got off the boat from the Old Sod.  And she’s only 13, so she has half a decade to decide for sure what she wants to do.

But in the event that she is truly serious, it looks like I’m going to have to dust off my old Basic Rifle Marksmanship manuals and teaching skills.  I was BRM instructor for my company in Arizona, and I was always the one detailed to work with the soldiers who thought that guns were icky.

Yeah, it was an Military Intelligence unit.  Yes, I’ve heard the jokes, and a lot of them are pretty close to the truth.  Yes, there are actually people who join the military that think the concept of guns is bad.  I was surprised too.

I’ve spent many hot Arizona days going over steady hold, trigger squeeze, breath control, and sight picture and alignment.  Guess I’m going to get to go over dime and washer exercises with my daughter.

All of this means that in the next couple of years I’ll be either building or buying a basic M4gery.  I don’t want her to learn on a high speed AR, then get to basic and have an issue weapon do all of the things that a slick AR has been crafted to not do.  Call it a bit of pride, but my daughter isn’t going to be “that girl” at the range unless being “that girl” means she’s the one who qualifies Expert on her first try.

Yes, He’s got a sense of humor, He does.

Chuck’s Having a Bad Day

Chuck Z. is over in Afghanistan, and apparently he’s had a run-in with one of our ‘allies’ in the fight to bring medieval tribesmen into the 17th century.

I had to be pulled out of the combined TOC after I used “fuck-stick” “slap-nuts” and “If you know so much, how come Afghanistan isn’t occupying FOBs in The US?” in one long tirade that (thankfully, in retrospect) wasn’t translated.

Go on over to his place and give him a little encouragement.

Product Review – New Menu MRE’s

Since today was hunt day for Girlie Bear and me, I decided to have a treat for lunch and grabbed two MRE’s out of the camping gear.  These are from the new menu, and I haven’t tried them, so I thought I’d try them out.

Girlie Bear got Beef Stew and I got Beef Brisket.  Here are my impressions:

  • Beef Stew – Dinty Moore quality.  ‘Nuf said.
  • Beef Brisket – For those of you who remember C-Rats, it was almost identical in taste and texture to Beef in Sauce.  It did, however, come with a tear-open packet of pretty good barbecue sauce to mix in.  This, however, made the meal almost soupy enough to drink.  It also came with a ‘biscuit’ that when mixed in made it a bit easier to eat with the included spoon.
  • Garlic Mashed Potatoes – The side dish for the Beef Stew meal.  These weren’t too bad, actually, but garlic mashed potatoes in field rations?  Really?  These must have been what the packet of Butter Buds in the accessory pack was intended for. 
  • Desserts – The Beef Stew came with a spiced pound cake, which Girlie Bear reported was quite yummy. The Beef Brisket came with what I call a “M&M Cookie“, but is described on the package as a “Cookie with Pan Coated Chocolate Disks”.  Both Girlie Bear and I gave this a thumbs up.
  • Hot Drinks  – The Beef Brisket came with hot cocoa, and the Beef Stew came with vanilla cappuccino.  Apparently, the days of mixing your instant coffee, cocoa, sugar, and creamer to make a poor man’s mocha are over.  These came in a new container, which is basically an hourglass shaped mylar envelope with a closer like a Zip-Loc bag on it.  The powder is in the envelope already, allowing the soldier to tear open the top, add water, re-close the envelope, shake to mix, then drink.  If hot water isn’t available, cold water can be used, and the drink can be heated using the meal’s heater packet.  Not sure how these taste or how easy it is to drink a hot liquid from a mylar envelope, but I’m going to give one of these a try tomorrow.
  • Accessory Packet – The coffee, creamer, and sugar are no longer included, at least not in these meals.  To me, this would be a problem, as one of my favorite tricks when I absolutely had to stay awake through exhaustion was to either put the instant coffee between my cheek and gums like it was chewing tobacco or to place it a granule at a time under my eyelids.  Either way, the pain and caffeine being absorbed directly into the blood stream would keep me awake for at least a few hours.  For those not that psychotic or self-hating, the ability to make a quick cup of coffee after gathering the fixings from several MRE’s was a lifesaver.   The Beef Brisket included a miniature bottle of Tobasco sauce, as was usual after the First Gulf War.  However, the Beef Stew instead had the Butter Buds flavoring for the potatoes instead.  Again, I see this as a problem.  The stew, while OK in flavor, definitely needed something added, especially if a soldier is going to be eating this item once every few days.
Overall, the two meals were pretty good, especially when compared with some of the other MRE’s I’ve eaten (Shelf stable omelet, anyone?).  My main quibbles are with how practical I see the hot beverage container and the lack of instant coffee and Tobasco in the accessory pack.  That being said, I would much rather spend several months eating this fare over the meals I regularly got in the 1990’s, even when the first menu changes came along in 1996 and 1997.
Disclaimer – I didn’t get anything for this review.  I paid for the product with my own money.

Paging Mr. Ahmadinajad

Iranian President Ahmadinajad, please pick up the white courtesy phone.  The U.S. Air Force has a message for you.

The Air Force is taking possession of some new ordnance, a bunker buster bomb that’s 5 times bigger than the next biggest conventional bomb.  It’s designed to penetrate facilities that are buried deep underground, with a stated purpose of destroying weapons of mass destruction programs.

Since we’re unlikely to bomb North Korea anytime soon, I wonder what this could be for?   Maybe someone in the Air Force is planning on a little urban renewal in Iran, perhaps?

Honestly, destroying Iran’s nuclear facilities will do nothing other than to delay their program, assuming that we can locate them with enough accuracy to actually target them with conventional weapons. Maybe it’ll be delayed for years, but unless we assist their nuclear scientists and engineers in achieving room temperature, they’ll just dig new, deeper tunnels and continue their march to the nuclear club.  It would probably be more fruitful to find ways to find and eliminate their nuclear staff than to bomb the facilities.  New tunnels can be dug in a couple of years.  It takes decades to create new scientists, even if you are importing them from China, Russia, and North Korea.