In early August, 1945, the United States dropped two atomic weapons over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The explosions, firestorm, and aftereffects killed hundreds of thousands of people.
Better minds than mine can discuss what happened and why.:
All I can say, with the long arm of hindsight assisting me, is that President Truman had run out of moral choices, so he picked the least immoral choice available to him to end the war.
Did his decision to employ these weapons kill hundreds of thousands of people, a large number of them civilians? Yes, it did.
Was it an unprecedented use of horrific weapons? Yes, it was.
But when faced with the choice of killing hundreds of thousands of people or killing potentially millions of Japanese and losing at least hundreds thousands of American and allied soldiers, sailors, and airmen, the Devil’s calculus dictated that Hiroshima and Nagasaki be destroyed to demonstrate to Japanese leadership that further resistance was not only futile, but cruel.
Had Truman chosen the other path, Japan would have been starved out, firebombed, and invaded by Americans and allies. Its army in Manchuria would have been utterly destroyed by Soviet forces, and a likely Soviet invasion of northern Japan would have brought about the partition of Japan as it did in Korea.
Leadership is more than making decisions. It’s making decisions when there is no good option.
Those who look back now and cry about the decisions made after over a decade of conflict in Asia and the Pacific should try putting themselves in Truman’s shoes for a bit. Better yet, they should put themselves in the shoes of American sailors and Marines who didn’t die storming a beach on Honshu. The best thing they can do is put themselves inside the head of a Japanese teenage boy who survived the war to lead a successful life instead of dying of hunger, disease, bullet, or gas defending a doomed regime.













