• Archives

  • Topics

  • Meta

  • The Boogeyman - Working Vacation
  • Coming Home
  • Via Serica

Brain Dropping

I half heard this playing this morning while I was getting dressed, and these have been going through my head all day.  I thought I’d share the madness:

Malfunction Junction, what’s your function?
Failures in feeding, and firing, and ejecting

Malfunction Junction, what’s your function?
Clearing up stovepipes and misfires and double feeds

Malfunction Junction, what’s your function?
SPORTS and racking and dropping the magazine

Malfunction Junction, what’s your function?
Cleaning and oiling and greasing and function checking

Malfunction Junction, what’s your function?
Swapping out springs and followers and guide rods

Advice Bleg

Apparently, I am an infuriating man who buys everything he wants for himself, which makes it difficult to purchase an anniversary gift.  So I have myself a nice Amazon gift card from my lovely wife.

I’m putting together a little dead-tree gunnie library. So far I have a decent translation of the Soviet manual for the Mosin-Nagant, Frank W. James’ Effective Handgun Defense, and a couple others.  
I’m considering getting something on the care and feeding of the M-1 Garand or one of those “If you only have one book about guns, get this one” bibles, but there are a lot of choices available.
So I’m asking for y’all’s help.  What gun books would you recommend?

An Heirloom Comes Home

A Texas man is celebrating the return of a family heirloom that was stolen a decade ago.  The item in question is a nickel plated Colt single action .45, given to his grandfather in 1901.  So in addition to the value of such an antique, there’s the sentimental value of getting your granddad’s gun back.

Apparently someone stole it, and the ATF got a tip that someone was trying to sell it, arrested two goblins, and then returned the gun to the family after the trial was over.*

I’m glad to see a part of this families history returned to it, and I’m glad to see two of the thieves that took it from them going away.  For once, cheers to the ATF.

*I know, I’m shocked too.

Gunnie Google Doodle

Today is the anniversary of the birth of Marie Curie, and Google has honored her memory by giving her her own Doodle.

There have been other custom Doodles, as Google calls it when they modify their page logo to something for a special occasion.  There have been pictures of famous people, animations, and even games.

But what about a Gunnie Doodle?

The birthday of John Moses Browning (PBUH) is coming up in January.  What if there was an animated Google Doodle for this event?

In my mind’s eye, I see something kind of like this starting up when you go to Google for a search on the anniversary of JMB’s birth.

I know, I’m never going to see it.  “Don’t be evil” includes not acknowledging firearms or gun rights in any way that doesn’t make Google money, but a guy can dream.

What do you all think would make a good Doodle for Google to celebrate something gun related?   Maybe a picture of a DC gun permit for the anniversary of Heller?

Quiz on Second Amendment Knowledge

The Christian Science Monitor has posted up a quiz on general knowledge of the Second Amendment and gun rights in general.  It’s pretty high level, but I think it’s a pretty good place to do a check on your overall knowledge.  And yeah, you can argue about some of the “why did this happen” and “what does this mean?” questions, but that’s what we’ve been doing in the courts and on the gun sites since I can remember.

I scored 10 out of 12, missing two questions about NFA 34.  Guess I know where I need to study up.

How did y’all do?

An Open Letter

Dear Senator Feinstein and Assistant Attorney General Breuer,

After reading transcripts of your performances yesterday, all I can say is this:

With all due respect to your offices, bite my hairy butt. 

Madam Senator, more people are killed by cars every year than will ever be killed by people using modern sporting rifles they bought at a gun store after undergoing a NICS check.  Oh, and by the way, anyone can walk into a dealership and buy a car with no background check, or pay cash to someone they met online for one, or even purchase an automobile across state lines and have them shipped to their homes.  One final thought for you:  ownership of a car is not enshrined in the document that authorizes you to draw a paycheck.

Mr. Assistant Attorney General, our right to keep and bear arms has nothing to do with sporting or hunting.  It’s about self defense, preparation to defend the nation, and keeping our government respectful of our other rights.  Putting food on the table or shooting skeet is just a side benefit.  Saying that we should only own guns that are useful for hunting or sporting is like saying that we should only be allowed to read books that fall into the comics and self-help genres, or be represented by lawyers who fall into the personal injury or family law specialties. 

Hopefully this little screed helps you to remember that “shall not be infringed” does not equate to “if we feel comfortable letting you”.  I’m assuming that you both can read at some level, so here, educate yourself.  Feel free to ask for help in sounding out the big words.

Respectfully,

Daddy J. Bear

Stump Speech

Ladies and Gentlemen, thank you for having me here today.

I’m here to talk about something that many of you might find disagreeable to talk about in polite company: misconduct on the part of law enforcement.  But before anyone accuses me and Candidate X of being anti-cop, let me start with a bit of a disclaimer:  It is our heartfelt belief that the vast majority of law enforcement people, be they local, state, or federal, are good people who have followed a calling to try to keep the lid on the parts of our society that refuse to follow our agreed-upon rules.  This post should in no way lead you to believe that either Candidate X or I hold LEO’s in general in anything but respect.

However, there are a few bad apples in every basket, and the 1% that breaks the laws or abuses its authority colors our perception of the other 99%.  The answer to this problem, like almost every other government problem, is to shed light on them so that the world can see them. 

So here we go:

  • A woman in New York asserts that an NYPD officer, who is also under suspicion for allegedly planting drugs on otherwise innocent people in order to meet an arrest quota, forced her to use drugs and then sexually assaulted her.  
  • Five NYPD officers have been arrested, along with seven others, for taking part in a scheme to smuggle guns, cigarettes, and slot machines. 
  • A female blogger had a bit of a surprise when she opened her suitcase after a flight to Ireland to find a TSA notice in her baggage that said “Get your freak on girl!”.  Apparently the young lady had packed her sex toy, and is now asking the TSA to investigate the incident.  The TSA says there’s no evidence their officers wrote the note.

So what do we have here?  We have a police officer abusing his position of power, breaking the law, and assaulting a female.  Then, we have police officers taking part in an organized scheme to break firearms, tobacco, and gambling laws.  We also have unprofessional conduct by members of a government organization that has had issues with theft, bribery, and disregard for the civil rights of citizens. 

The first one I lay squarely at the feet of those who continue to defend the need for a War on (some) Drugs.  Yeah, if the young ladies accusations are true, the guy’s a jerk with or without the drugs.  But it’s the fact that the drugs are illegal that gave the guy the power in this specific case.  Take away the illegality of the drugs, and you take away the intoxicant used to force the young lady into sex.  You also remove the incentive to frame innocent people for having drugs.  No illegal drugs means no need to have a quota for drug arrests.

Next, we have an interstate conspiracy to smuggle guns, cigarettes, and gambling equipment.  The cigarettes, while legal by themselves, are probably smuggled because of lower prices and taxes in other states.  The gambling equipment and guns are illegal because of federal and state laws that try to control how we lead our lives, and no more.  Why is taking a slot machine into New York an offense?  Because someone in the state or federal legislature didn’t care for gambling, so they made it illegal.  Same with guns, both at the federal and state levels.  I have news for those who think that the state should control who has guns, which guns they should have, and how they should acquire and use them:  You can buy just about any gun you want in most parts of the country, and the streets don’t run red with blood.  Most places don’t even require you to have a license to do it.  And most shockingly of all, you can carry that gun either openly or concealed, and children don’t spontaneously combust because of your actions. 

Finally, we have adults acting like children, but it is a symptom of something that should chill the blood of every American.  As I see it, the TSA is rotten to the core.  It’s continued, and now expanding, role as gropers, hinderers, and bullies is an affront to the rule of law and civil rights.  Its short history is fraught with stories of people being humiliated, intimidated, and violated.  And now the agency is expanding to doing its work on our highways.  Is the supposed security the TSA is providing us worth the continued erosion of our right to freely move about the country while conducting legal business?

My point on the first and second cases is this:  stop making silly things illegal, and people will stop doing silly things to get around your silly law.  Stop criminalizing the use of narcotics, and punish bad behavior that comes from their use.  Stop legislating morality by outlawing gambling or guns, and people will stop smuggling them into your state.  Stop charging an exorbitant amount of tax on cigarettes, and control smoking through other means, like telling people that Medicaid and Medicare won’t pay to treat people who smoke, and people will stop smuggling cigarettes.  Taking that stand would probably save millions in healthcare costs on its own.

For the TSA case, it’s another example of why the TSA needs to be either drastically reformed and limited, or abolished altogether.  I have never seen anything that definitively shows that the TSA has made us any safer, but I can probably find hundreds of stories about how they have taken away a lot of our liberty.

To sum up, we need to find a way to punish those who abuse their rights without taking the rights of others away.

While there may be bad cops, just as there are bad accountants, bad IT guys, and bad truck drivers, our laws aren’t helping.  We make more things illegal all the time, and usually not because there is an actual harm done to society by the thing, but because we don’t personally care for it or we are scared of it.  In order to make it less likely that our law enforcement will act badly, take away the incentive to abuse their power and break the law.

Candidate X and I will make it the theme of our administration to take the government out of as many aspects of your lives as we can.  We will start by working to repeal laws that on their face violate civil rights because someone felt icky about the concept of a free people doing as they wish.  We will reduce the profit incentive to break the law by making fewer things illegal.  Our citizens will have more of their freedom restored, and we will hold those who abuse their rights and authority to harm others responsible for their actions without punishing the public at large.

Thank you for your time.  Please remember, this is your country.  Only you will be held responsible for its condition when you pass it on to the next owner.

Number Day

Fred over at Guns and Coffee reminded me that today is October 22, 10/22.  To commemorate this auspicious day, here’s a pic of mine:

I’ve shown you mine, now you show me yours!

Good for him

The owner of a tobacco store in Louisville proved the old adage “Don’t use a gun in a crime.  Your victim might take it away and shoot you with it”.

The jerkoff who tried to rob the smoke shop got a bullet in the leg for his trouble, and is currently in the hospital awaiting his time in the gray bar hotel with a distinct limp.

Excuse me for a little schadenfreude here, but I hope it hurt like a son of a gun.

Gun Lust, I has it

I love my Mosin Nagant 91/30.  I shoot it as much as I do my 10/22.  It’s reasonably accurate (minute of  Nazi at 200 yards), cheap to shoot, and comfortable on the shoulder.  Yeah, I get a humungous bruise after shooting 40 rounds through it in an afternoon, but it’s a good bruise.   Ammunition, even though it’s come up significantly since I started shooting it, is dirt cheap, and there has started to be more brass cased ammunition on the market, so reloading is definitely possible.

But I’ve always wanted to take it and the 7.62x54r round it fires to another level.  I’ve put Mojo Microclick sights on the rifle, and I’m considering a Timney trigger too.  I bought a scope mount for it that replaces the rear sight and put a Long Eye Relief scope on it for a while, but eventually took it off.  I could just never get comfortable with that setup.

But none of the major American rifle manufacturers make guns in this caliber.  A search for aftermarket barrels hints that someone used to make them, but no-one appears to be selling them at the moment.

So what’s a 54r junkie with a jones for a modern hunting rifle to do?

Thanks to a FB friend, I have hope:

It’s a single shot break action, but that also intrigues me.  I’ve seen some Baikals in a few gun shops.  I’ll have to keep my eyes open for one in God’s Own Caliber (Eastern Orthodox).

Also, Izmash appears to be making a true hunting rifle in 7.62x54r.  Never seen one of these in the wild, but it’s definitely something to watch out for.

Until either the U.S. manufacturers wake up to the merits of 7.62x54r and the large market of people who already have Mosins or the Russian imports start to become more prevelant, I’ll just keep plugging away with my little 91/30.