• Archives

  • Topics

  • Meta

  • The Boogeyman - Working Vacation
  • Coming Home
  • Via Serica

30 Days of Shakespeare – Day 3

Good name in man and woman, dear my lord,
Is the immediate jewel of their souls.
Who steals my purse steals trash. ‘Tis something, nothing:
‘Twas mine, ’tis his, and has been slave to thousands.
But he that filches from me my good name
Robs me of that which not enriches him
And makes me poor indeed.
Othello, Act III, Scene III
My Take – At our core, all we really have is our good name.  Someone who defames us and steals that good name from us is the worst kind of thief.  We are watching the use of defamation, slander, and hyperbole convict a man in the public square rather than have his actions judged in a court of law.  Regardless of his guilt or innocence, this is an unkind cut, even more so than any prison term or civil judgement.  We should always be prepared to defend our good name from those who would destroy it.
Thanks to Kathy over at Cornered Cat for the suggestion!

Today’s Earworm

I thought this was appropriate for Good Friday.

30 Days of Shakespeare – Day 2

O, that way madness lies; let me shun that;
No more of that.  – King Lear, Act III, Scene IV

My Take –

Thoughts on the Evening

Bruises for Freedom

  • If I ever get someone to take a picture of me when I’m volunteering as a role player out at Fort Knox, I’m going to caption it “Yo dawg, I heard you liked bruises, so I put bruises on your bruises so you can bruise where you were bruised!”
  • Even if the end of the muzzle is sealed and it’s loaded with blanks, an AK-47 with a happy switch is a heck of a lot of fun.
  • Flash bangs are great crowd control devices.
  • It is amazing how fast you will back up when a flash bang grenade that hasn’t exploded yet bounces off your chest.
  • Every time I go out there, I’m reminded how lucky I am to have people such as the soldiers I meet to deal with the things that go bump in the night.

Question

Got into a heated discussion about medical marijuana with someone today.  Their stance was that most people who get access to medical marijuana are just looking to get high, while my position was that he was probably right, but that there are many people who benefit from it.

We ended the discussion agreeing to disagree and each admitting that the other had a point.  Afterwards, I continued to think about the issue, and I had an idea.

The main objection I’ve seen to medical marijuana was what my friend said:  A lot of people abuse the possibly legitimate utilization of marijuana as medicine for a discreet set of medical conditions because they want to get high.  It’s a running joke among people I know in California that going to a doctor and claiming that sometimes life stresses you out is a one way ticket to a prescription for Northern California Bliss.  There also seems to be the feeling that these systems of legalized use of marijuana are the camel’s nose under the tent flap towards normalization and legalization of other drugs such as cocaine and heroine.  If you can use weed to get rid of migraines, can’t you use Bolivian marching powder to lose weight or smack to get through those really tough periods in life?

My take on it is that a method of using cannabis to alleviate the suffering of truly sick people needs to be found.  Cancer patients, AIDS sufferers, and others can benefit from THC.  But I do agree that many people utilize medical marijuana dispensaries as their connection to a good buzz and nothing more.

So to those of you who don’t agree with the idea of medical marijuana, would you be OK with pharmacies dispensing THC in some pharmaceutical form such as pills, lozenges, or skin patches?  These are already used to dispense opiates to patients for pain control, so why not have them available, with a prescription, for those who currently utilize marijuana for medical conditions.  Heck, we gave prescription caffeine and nicotine to Little Bear when he was an infant to keep his heartrate up.  Ah, the joys of raising an extremely premature child.  People who would scream if we were to give an infant a dip of chewing tobacco and a Mountain Dew didn’t bat an eye as we mixed the evil stuff into his morning formula.

My point is that if cannabis has therapeutic uses, then we should exploit them.  If the current model of a dispensary selling weed, cookies, and lollipops is distasteful to most people, who not let pharmaceutical companies separate out the active ingredients, find a way to deliver it to patients that is as effective as smoking or eating it, and deliver it through existing pharmacy channels?

I’m not going to debate the legalization of marijuana from a libertarian standpoint.  I object to the government telling me I can’t do something to my own body so long as I don’t harm others while doing it, even if it’s something I wouldn’t do even if it was legal. I’m looking at the middle ground where a drug like THC could be legally used by those who could be helped by it in a way that doesn’t make people have visions of Haight-Ashbury.

Please let me know what y’all think in comments.

Today’s Earworm

It’s that time of year.

How Dare He?

A TSA screener in New York is looking for a new job after flinging a cup of hot coffee at an airline pilot who asked her to ease off on the cussing.

A TSA screener was arrested at JFK Airport for hurling a cup of hot coffee at an American Airlines pilot who told her and some colleagues to tone down a profanity-laced conversation in a terminal, sources said yesterday.

Normally, I’d say the pilot should have minded his own business and chalked this one up to someone acting like trash in public, but in this case I’ll make an exception.
You see, the TSA wants arrest powers, meaning they want to be police*.  To me that means they should be held to a higher standard in conduct than I would hold most other government employees.  You want the ability to use the force of government to make me comply with the law?  Well then, you get to act like a professional when you’re wearing the uniform I bought for you.  If you can’t handle that, why should we trust you with the power to deprive citizens of their liberty when they refuse to take part in your ‘security’ Kabuki theater?
Yeah, the pilot could have walked away and let trash be trash, but if you can’t handle being told to tone it down in public, then take off the uniform and go back to picking up cigarette butts in the medians.
P.S.  Borepatch has a couple of words to say about airport ‘security’ too.
*Call it what you will, but if you want the authority to arrest someone, you’re asking to be a cop, with all of the powers and responsibility thereof.  To me, that means that you have the power stop someone from doing something that’s illegal, even to the point of using lethal force to enforce the will of the law.  The responsibilities that come with that power is to be trained properly, to act like a professional, and to be impartial in your dealings with the public.  Don’t want those responsibilities to go with the power to put on the flex cuffs?  Tough toenails.  If you can’t do the things we expect of you, you shouldn’t be wearing a badge and uniform, much less a gun and cuffs.  Willing to take those responsibilities and act like a professional?  Then we can start talking about whether or not your job requires you to have the power to detain citizens, but not until then.

30 Days of Shakespeare – Day 1

Look like the innocent flower,
But be the serpent under it. — Macbeth, Act I, Scene V

My Take – I don’t see the need to walk around looking like Billy Badass in order to feel safe.  I stay situationally aware, mind my manners, dress conservatively, and am prepared to fight like a treed bear if I’m threatened. 

Odysseus and the Lotus Eaters

In the Odyssey, Odysseus and his crew were blown off course and made land in a country populated by people who did nothing but eat a fruit that was so good that they cared for nothing else.  After members of his crew tasted the fruit and lost interest in continuing the journey home, Odysseus ordered the remainder of his men back on the boat and forced those who had tasted the fruit to get on board.  He then rowed away to continue his journey.

In our lives, we are confronted with lotus eaters every day.  Some are harmless, some annoying, and some destructive.

There are the obvious ones who are addicted to some substance or other.  Their addiction can rob them of their jobs, homes, families, and ultimately their lives.  These poor people can not only ruin themselves, but can also rend the lives of all who care for them. 

There are the lotus eaters who are mesmerized by the distractions of the world around them.  Maybe they are buried deep within television, or their books of romantic or action fantasies take up their lives.  These tend to be annoying because they sometimes cannot relate to what is real, preferring to try to cast everything in the stark light of a Harlequin romance rather than what real life is like.   These can also be the people who do not truly believe in evil because they have either never seen evil or if they have, deny it.  To them, the bad things in the world are far away, and life for them will be good as long as they don’t think or speak of the bad that is or that may be.  Bad people live somewhere else, bad things happen to someone else, and bad thoughts bring bad things.  An extreme example of this is the person that believes that no-one is truly bad or evil, and that those who do bad were forced into it by circumstances.  To this strain of lotus eater, possessing the tools that can be used to do evil is the cause of evil.  Remove the tool, and the evil cannot happen.

Then there are the more insidious lotus eaters, the ones that continually eat from the public trough and give no thought as to where it all comes from or consider that they should provide for themselves.  They are the ones that have never known a day’s work for their food and shelter, and denigrate those who prefer to work for their bread.  To me, these are worse than addicts because they can never be satisfied, even temporarily, and it is impossible to overdose on the forced charity of others.  They will eat and eat, always assuming that those who fill the trough can always get more. When those who produce what they are glutting themselves upon attempt to reduce the ration, they squeal and rant until the free bread is given just to silence them.

We all know lotus eaters, and we must all guard ourselves so that we do not become them.  How easy it would be to stop the struggle to be a real person, conscious of the world around us, in control of our own faculties, and providing for ourselves and our families.  How inviting it would be to lie down in the shade, eat of the delicious fruit, and let someone else worry and work in our stead. 

That we must never do.

We are all born free, and free we must remain.  We must have the honesty to look ourselves in the mirror and say “Today, I have earned what I have and protected it from the evil that is in the world.”.  We must teach our children, both in what we do and what we say, about the real world and how they should act when confronted by it.  To the lotus eaters in our lives, we must be a shining example of what they are not and should be.  If possible, we should save those we care about from a life of oblivion, even to the point of forcing them to look into a mirror and see the person they have become.

The fruit of the lotus is sweet, and the freedom from caring about what is happening to us and around us beckons.  But as free people, we must resist that seduction, look life squarely in the eye, and be prepared to struggle with it.

Homework Assignment

A judge on the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals assigned a three page, single spaced paper on whether or not the Obama administration believes that courts have the authority to review laws and declare laws unconstitutional if necessary to a lawyer that is arguing a case before him.  The Justice Department has 48 hours to respond.

Recently, President Obama made a speech in which he ‘encouraged’ the Supreme Court to find his signature healthcare law constitutional.  He cautioned the Court that as ‘unelected’ judges, they shouldn’t undo what Congress had done.  Apparently during his time as a Constitutional Law scholar, Mr. Obama never read about Marbury v Madison.

Judicial review of law and how it is applied is exactly the reason we have higher courts.  Local courts are perfectly capable of finding out matters of guilt, innocence, and liability.  The higher courts are there to answer questions about whether or not something that the government is doing violates the limits placed on it by the Constitution.

Finding a law to be unconstitutional is not judicial activism, especially when that law is unprecedented in its granting of new powers to the government.  President Obama knows better, and is playing to the crowd and trying to cow the judiciary in the vein of President Roosevelt.  Something tells me that Justice Kennedy isn’t going to fold in 2012 like Justice Roberts did in 1937.

For his sake, I hope the Justice Department flunky assigned to write up this report does a good job. I’ve heard that judges are tough graders, and this one sounds pissed.