• Archives

  • Topics

  • Meta

  • The Boogeyman - Working Vacation
  • Coming Home
  • Via Serica

Don’t Get Cocky

I was glad to see the news this morning that, for now, the situation in Nevada involving a rancher and the federal Bureau of Land Management has been defused.  Faced with a growing group of protesters on-site and a growing backlash from politicians at the state and federal level, BLM has stopped trying to round up the cattle that Mr. Bundy has been grazing on federal land.

As I understand it, Mr. Bundy has failed to pay the normal fees that ranchers pay to utilize such lands, claiming that he does not recognize federal authority over lands he thinks should rightly belong to his state, Nevada.  He also claims a long-standing familial connection to the land, since his pioneer ancestors used them.  The federal government disagrees, and has been in court with Mr. Bundy for years.  It would appear that the round-up of Mr. Bundy’s cattle on federal land was the latest in a series of skirmishes in and out of court between Bundy and the federal government.

On this string of the tangled knot, I have to side with the federal government.  We, through our representatives, have given the federal government the power and the job to regulate public lands in all 50 states.  Whether this is a constitutionally sound role for the federal government hasn’t, as far as I know, been decided one way or another by the courts.  Since the courts continue to rule in favor of the government in cases like Bundy’s, I feel safe in saying that it is constitutional.

Bundy seems to have recognized this when he was paying the fees to use federal lands for grazing prior to 1993.  Why he stopped, I don’t know.  As for his reasoning that because his family has been grazing on that land for a long time, he ought to be able to do it at will, I can’t agree with this.  What his grandfather was able to do has nothing to do with what he is able to do, so long as the law that changes that ability is constitutional.

Now, just to bring things back around, I’m going to fault the government in the way they went about this whole thing.  Yes, I believe that it was a proper use of government power to confiscate cattle that are illegally grazing on public lands.  But to do so with armed federal agents, possibly including snipers, is out of bounds.  The term I’m looking for here is “improper escalation”.   (Why BLM has armed agents in the first place is a subject for later discussion.  Remember – Texas Rangers, FBI, Secret Service, and that’s the entire list of people in the federal government that don’t salute when they pass one another and should be issued weapons.)

Once Mr. Bundy and his family began to physically oppose the roundup, BLM should have called the local sheriff and the governor of Nevada requesting local law enforcement assistance.  I’m not saying that the locals would have handled things any better than the feds did, but a few deputies going out to the Bundy place and talking to him might have gone over better than having his son tazed by a nameless federal agent.

Reports are that BLM decided that discretion was the better part of valor after protesters in Nevada began openly defying the roundup.  Some of the protesters appear to have been armed with rifles.  I’ll give the feds points here for looking at what was shaping up and deciding that some cows and turtles aren’t worth spilling quarts of blood and gallons of ink on their already tarnished reputation.

So, we can chalk this one up to a ‘win’ for those of us who want the government to learn its proper place, assuming that this is really over.  I, for one, don’t believe that it is.  The government claims that Mr. Bundy owes over $1.1 million in fees, and I’ll bet that the cost of this latest round of confrontation will get tacked onto that.  I wouldn’t be surprised if BLM lawyers aren’t already at work for the next round of court battles.

Another thing I see coming is someone, probably a resident or employee of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, making a stink about the fact that the protesters were at least as well armed as the federal agents they faced.  Coupled with the shootings at Fort Hood and Kansas City, I expect that this incident will be used to try to rekindle the gun control debate.  This would give the Democrats something to whip up their base in what promises to be a harsh election cycle.  All it would take for that to really catch fire is for something as horrific as Aurora or Sandy Hook to happen, and we’re right back where we were last winter.

Let’s be happy that the situation in Nevada didn’t get out of hand, and that the federal government deescalated.  Let’s hope that this is the beginning of a pattern of change in the behavior of the government.  But let’s never forget that our response is always being watched, and will be used against us, either in court or in the press.

We need more taxes

No, it’s not April Fool’s Day.  Here me out.

I have come to the realization that one of the things wrong with our country is that we have too few taxes.  Having one or two huge taxes like Social Security withholding and income tax means that, to the average taxpayer, it all goes to this amorphous blob called “The Government”.  What I want is for the government to chop these monolithic taxes into smaller bites so that the people know where their money is going.  I want a separate tax for every government activity.  I also want taxpayers to know, on a paycheck to paycheck basis, how much they’re kicking into the pot.

For example, your paystub should look something like this:

Net Base Pay $ 5,000.00
Federal Taxes
 DOD Foreign Aid Tax 2.500000% $125.000000
 Military R&D Tax 0.500000% $25.000000
 NATO Tax 0.010000% $0.500000
 War on Terror Tax 0.100000% $5.000000
 Military Buildings and Staff Tax 1.000000% $50.000000
 Federal Medicare Tax 10.000000% $500.000000
 Federal Road Taxes 0.010000% $0.500000
 Federal Education Tax 0.050000% $2.500000
 Law Enforcement Tax 5.000000% $250.000000
 Social Security Tax 5.000000% $250.000000
 Food Benefits Tax 0.100000% $5.000000
 Unemployment Insurance Tax 0.100000% $5.000000
 State Department Embassy and Staff Tax 0.010000% $0.500000
 State Department Foreign Aid Tax 0.000100% $0.005000
 Forestry Service Tax 0.000010% $0.000500
 Congressional Buildings and Staff Tax 0.010000% $0.500000
 Executive Buildings and Staff Tax 0.010000% $0.500000
 Judiciary Buildings and Staff Tax 0.010000% $0.500000
NASA Tax 0.000001% $0.000050
FCC Tax 0.000001% $0.000050
FTC Tax 0.000001% $0.000050
IRS Tax 0.000100% $0.005000
EPA Tax 0.000100% $0.005000
BLM Tax 0.000001% $0.000050
Total Federal Taxes 24.41031% $1,220.52
Net Pay $3779.48

Of course, this is just an example.  An complete list of each and every tax that would be pulled from your paycheck would be a lot longer.  I would also want sections for the state and federal taxes, with the same detail.

Why would I want this?  I want this because when the average voter and taxpayer looks at her paystub and sees all the things our government is doing and how much that is costing them personally, I believe that when someone says “Why are we sending troops to Outer Jerkholistan?” or “Why are we paying for another Department of Education study to see if piping in the sound of sperm whales mating helps children learn to read?”, they’ll understand.  Saying “We’re going to take a couple hundred dollars out of your check for stuff.  Don’t bother asking what that stuff is.” gives politicians and bureaucrats a lot of cover to waste a lot of money.  If I’m seeing line items in my paycheck going up, I’ll want to know why.

Want a real shocker?  I believe we need higher taxes in our country.

Put away the pitchforks and hear me out on this one too.

Currently, when the government wants to do something, from building roads and schools to sending troops overseas, there is no fiscal restraint on that decision.  Someone at the Treasury Department adds a couple of zeroes to the federal debt, sells a few more bonds, and the money to do things magically appears.  I want to hamstring that ability.

I want the federal budget to be run without deficits.  I think a lot of us do.  We’ve gotten nowhere in the past half century or so when it comes to actually cutting spending.  We nibble around at the edges and use cuts as a way to either reward political allies or punish our foes, but nothing really gets done in the end.

I want that to stop.  I want the government to be honest with the American people about how much it costs to do our business.

When the President wants to send troops overseas on his latest pet foreign policy project, or spend billions of dollars on new fighters, bombers, submarines, tanks, rifles, or whatever, I want someone to stand up on the floor of the Congress and say “This is going to cost $500 billion a year.  This bill contains the tax to pay for that. Voting is now open.”.  The same goes when a Congresscritter wants a new bridge to nowhere built in their district or wants to expand welfare spending to include anyone making less than 10 times the poverty level.

When we stop masking government spending in meaningless deficit numbers and start forcing them to come to us directly and say “We want to do this, so you need to start paying up.”, people will take a good hard look at what they want, what they need, and what they’re willing to pay for.

My guess is that once we start forcing the American taxpayer to pay cash on the barrelhead for not only those things they like, but also those things they don’t like, then the number and size of those things will come under a lot more scrutiny, as will the politicians who keep piling things on the bill.  In the end, I think that forcing us to pay attention will force the government to become smaller, leaner, and less expensive.

 

All is well! Really!

It’s been a couple of weeks since the mob violence in downtown Louisville.  Since then, there have been a couple of comparatively minor incidents, and of course, this weekend is Thunder Over Louisville.

Here are a few highlights from the news:

First and foremost, Mayor Fischer would rather that those of us who carry a gun for self defense not do so at Thunder.  He promises that new surveillance cameras and the horde of police that will be in the area will take care of any problems that might arise.  Of course, the police haven’t been able to keep downtown Louisville from turning into a parking lot with the attendant road rage after Thunder in the past, so you make your own decision.  I guess it’s better that the herd animals not be able to resist the jackals who are smart enough to wait until the post-fireworks pandemonium to start breaking shi… I mean, expressing their frustration with the current socioeconomic situation in Louisville.  No word yet on whether Mayor Fischer will be leaving his police escort behind and taking his family to mix with the crowds and walk a mile back to his car in the dark.

Next, we have a representative of the Louisville Friends of Police reporting that rumors of police masking crime in Waterfront Park by assigning crimes to other addresses are untrue. Honestly, I’m going to wait until I see hard data on this.  How many crimes have been reported and documented in Waterfront Park in the past 10 years, and how many have been assigned to businesses within a block of the park?

Finally, we have a leaked memo from the FBI that claims that a local gang, composed mainly of middle schoolers, is to blame for all this ruckus.  Apparently 14 year olds have enough charisma to get a few hundred people to rampage through downtown, break stuff, steal other stuff, and lay a beating on people who happen to be in their way.  Also, there appears to be a special ‘gun train’ that travels across Louisville with firearms that are easily stolen.  If you’ve ever written a real intelligence report, that thing is just embarrassing.

So there we are. A mayor who would rather that law-abiding citizens rely on the presence and power of the police to protect them while they’re a member of a big juicy target group, a police representative who wants us to know that the police have never, ever faked a report to make the city look better, and the FBI getting involved with local gang activity.

Enjoy your Thunder, Louisville.  For me and mine, we’ll be staying home.   By the way, if you’re a gun owner and would rather go somewhere that you’re more welcome, the Knob Creek Machine Gun Shoot is this weekend too.  There’ll be plenty of thunder there too, and if you come out on Friday night, I’ll even sell a raffle ticket for some guns to you.

Movie Quotes – Day 95

What would you do with a brain if you had one?  — The Wizard of Oz

This delves into Kentucky politics a bit, but bear with me.  Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is being challenged in the Republican primary by Matt Bevin.  Mr. Bevin leans toward the conservative, Tea Party branch of the GOP, while Senator McConnell is more of an establishment Republican.  OK, he’s the poster child for the establishment wing of the party, and his continued willingness to compromise principle in order to get… something out of the Obama administration is one of the reasons I’m supporting Mr. Bevin in the primary.  Heck, being able to vote against McConnell was the sole reason I re-registered as a Republican after deciding to go Independent after the 2012 election.

As much as I dislike Mr. McConnell, I like Mr. Bevin’s positions on a lot of issues more.  He espouses the smaller government, individual liberty, pro-gun opinions that I value.  He’s run a business, even if he had to work with the government to keep it open after it was destroyed by fire.  I don’t agree with him on a few things, but I’m not looking for purity, just competency and principles.  I will probably vote for Bevin in the primary, as opposed to voting against McConnell.  He just seems to be smart and competent.

Then I read this.

Some things are just toxic, and shouldn’t be touched.  Some people and some issues don’t deserve our attention, no matter how much they couch their argument in our favorite language.  Would Bevin speak at a NAMBLA rally if the organizers were pushing to get rid of federal child porn laws?  I would certainly hope not, and he shouldn’t have appeared at this rally.

Either he and his campaign knew about the content of this gathering and didn’t care, or they didn’t bother to do their homework about it in the first place.  Either way, it’s unacceptable.  Bevin has a slim chance of victory in May, and this doesn’t help.

Bevin needs to get in front of this, admit the cock-up, and move on.

Not to pick on my own side, let’s talk about Representative Jim Moran, Democrat of Virginia.

Mr. Moran, who has served in Congress since 1991, seems to believe that the $174,000 in salary that members of Congress receive every year just isn’t enough.   It’s just not enough to keep a roof over their heads and bread in their mouths, you see.

Let’s not consider how many people go into Congress merely rich, but come out of it filthy rich.  Let’s forget about how insider trading laws don’t apply to members of Congress. Let’s concentrate on how the Senators and Representatives make a habit out of having two residences, one in Washington and one back home.  Let’s concentrate on how unfair it is to expect someone who volunteered for their position, campaigned long and hard to get it, and who tends to stay in it for as long as they choose to keep it is making almost three times the median income for their work area.  Let’s concentrate on a debate on term limits.

Moran is out of touch.   I hope that his constituents are paying attention, and that they replace him this fall.  Heck, I don’t care if another Democrat gets elected in November, just not this particular Moran.

Politics is starting to become one of those subjects that I don’t consider unless I’ve been drinking, and it’s stories like these that explains this new attitude.

Refutations and Insults

I’m always torn on whether to read the agitprop that lands in my inbox from the White House, but it’s usually good for a laugh.  I got this today.  My comments are in bold.

 

Good afternoon,

Howdy

I am a staunch Republican, a self-proclaimed Fox News addict, and I didn’t vote for the President. And I’m here to tell you that Obamacare works. I’m living proof.

Sure, Obamacare works, so long as someone else is paying for it.  

I’m a chemotherapy patient, and was previously paying $428 a month for my health coverage. I was not thrilled when it was cancelled.

I’m a chronic auto-immune disease patient, who takes some really nifty-neato medications that cost an arm and a leg.  But since they help to make sure I can keep using my arms and legs, I pay for them.  I also make sure I keep my job and the good health insurance that comes from a lifetime of busting my ass.  I’d be annoyed if that got cancelled, but I’d find some way to keep my self-respect and not go on the public dole if that happened.

Interesting that you don’t say why your health insurance was cancelled.  Did you have a minimum-coverage plan that was made illegal by the ACA?   Maybe your employer decided that it was cheaper to just pay the find, I’m sorry, tax and quit offering it?

Then I submitted an application at HealthCare.gov. I looked at my options. And I signed up for a plan for $62 a month.

Great.  How much bread did you steal from the mouths of my children to get your premium down that low, if you don’t mind me asking?

It’s the best health care I have ever had.

Dude, if you had shitty healthcare for $428 a month, you should have done something about that years ago.  Like, you know, changing jobs or buying your own.  Just saying.

So right now, here’s what I want to tell anyone who still needs health insurance, or knows someone who does:

Sign up. Follow the instructions on the website. Apply, and look at your options. You still have time, and take it from me: This is something you want to do.

Here’s my advice to those who need insurance, or knows someone who does:  Grow a sense of shame and quit trying to suckle from the great whore on the Potomac.  Get off your ass and provide for yourself.  Or don’t.  Your choice.  Just quit forcing the rest of us to provide for you.

I wrote a letter to President Obama this past February to tell him about my experience with the Health Insurance Marketplace. I hoped he’d read it, and he did.

Good for you.  I wonder if he read that letter I sent him last spring telling him that I didn’t want him in my gun safe any more than he wanted me in his bedroom?  

I may not be a supporter of the President. But now, I get mad when I see Obamacare dragged through the mud on television.

I get mad when I look at the almost 40% of my paycheck that is taken out to pay for the leeches that either work for the government or have figured out that Uncle Sugar will keep them drawing breath so long as they keep voting the way they want them to or at least pen spam for the Politburo.

And even though I regularly tune in to conservative pundits, I’d like to tell them they’re getting it wrong. Obamacare works.

If it works so well, why does every date slip in the President’s project plan?  If I delayed things the way he did, I’d be shown the door.  Successful plans tend to get implemented on time, or at least close to being on time.

So one more time: If you still need health insurance, you have just three days to get it. Do what I did. Go to HealthCare.gov, submit an application, and pick a plan that works for you.

Or, you can get off your ass, quit being a parasite, and take care of your own damned self.

It just might change your life.

Yeah, providing for your own needs without making the rest of us pay for it might change your life, too.  Seriously, I hope your chemo goes well, and you wallow in shame in having to go to Obama with hat in hand to get it.

Mark D. Bearden, Ph.D.
Monroe, North Carolina

Insults and Refutations

I received the following email this afternoon.  I’m honored that His Excellency, President Obama, would take the time to reach out to little old me to explain his new initiative to make McDonalds hamburgers and ammunition at Walmart more expensive.

My remarks are in italics.  And yes, I know this got very, very long.  I just couldn’t find the bottom of this particular cesspool.

The White House

Washington

Hello everyone,

Howdy, Mr. President.  It’s nice to hear from you.

Earlier today, I signed an Executive Order to raise the minimum wage to $10.10 for federal contract workers.

How nice of you to do that.  I really appreciate you unilaterally doing things like that.  Nothing like going above and beyond the requirements of a signed contract.  How much of your own paycheck are you giving up to make this happen?

It’s the right thing to do. But what’s more, companies have found that when their employees earn more, they’re more motivated, they work harder, and they stick around longer. You should expect the same of your federal government.

Companies have found that what motivates people who make minimum wage is the chance to get the heck off the bottom rung of the economic ladder and quit making minimum wage.   You’d know this if you’d ever had to struggle.  By that, I mean ‘hold down a low-paying job in order to put food in your mouth’.  I’d really love to know how you managed to not starve while you were in college.  My guess your job didn’t involve brooms or deep fryers.

The bottom line is this: We are a nation that believes in rewarding honest work with honest wages. And America deserves a raise.

Sure we do.  Why don’t you give us one by cutting or eliminating income taxes?  What?  That’s not what you’re talking about?  How rude of me to suggest that you quit taking a good chunk of each and every mouthful of food that goes on my children’s plates.  Sorry.

The order I signed today will help folks across the country. But it’s not enough.

Right now, there’s a bill in Congress that would raise the federal minimum wage to $10.10 an hour for all Americans. It would lift wages for more than 28 million current workers, and would move millions of Americans out of poverty. That means businesses would have customers with more money to spend.

Raising the minimum wage would grow the economy for everyone.

Especially for people who figure out a way to make the same amount of food, wash the same number of dishes, or clean the same number of buildings with fewer people.

You don’t need to believe me: Believe the 600 economists — including seven Nobel Prize winners — who wrote both houses of Congress last month to remind them that the bill before them will have little or no negative effect on jobs.

Since you’re a Nobel laureate yourself, and we all know how much respect I got for the Nobel prize system when you got that, this means a lot to me.  

When I stood before both chambers of Congress and said that I intended for 2014 to be a year of action, that wasn’t just a nice line in a speech. It was an acknowledgment that we’ve got to restore opportunity for everyone in America — the idea that no matter who you are, or how you started out, you can get ahead here if you’re responsible and willing to work for it. That’s what this “year of action” is all about.

Funny, everyone I know who started out at minimum wage, busted their tail, and kept their nose clean seems to be doing OK at the moment.  It’s like the minimum wage wasn’t a hinderance to them getting ahead.  It’s almost like making crappy wages was a stimulus to do something that made more money.

And since that speech, I have taken actions on my own to make it easier for folks to save for retirement, help working Americans get the skills that good jobs demand, and assist millions of Americans who have been looking for work for several months. I’ve announced a major new commitment toward connecting our schools to 21st-century technology.

Right, because people couldn’t get an IRA, or get into a college or a tech school, or bust their ass to find a job before your speech.  And I hate to tell you this, Mr. President, but the only use I’ve seen most of the high schoolers I know put high-speed internet to is to download pictures of naked people, play games in class, or text their BFF’s about how much chemistry sucks.  A fractional T1 and some new iThingies aren’t going to make sure our children get a good education.  Right now, I’ll trade the ability to circumvent a proxy so they can get to pr0n for basic literacy and math skills, which we were able to impart upon our children way before Jobs and Wozniak started their little produce company.

That action continues today, and in the months to come.

Oh, praise Cthulhu.  It’s only been 5 years since you first mouthed the words to the oath of office, and we’re finally going to see some action out of your office. 

Take a look at what we’ve done already and what’s to come.

DB Note – That’s a link to a webpage detailing the things that the Grand Exalted Grand PooBah has done since the State of the Union address.  Here are the highlights:

Raising the Minimum Wage – I’ve already had my say about this, so I won’t beat this particular dead horse anymore.  I’ll leave that in your more than capable hands.

Helping Americans Retire With Dignity – Like I said above, nothing’s been keeping the American people from buying into a private retirement plan if that’s what they want to do.  All this does is funnel more of those sweet, sweet taxpayer dollars into the general federal budget.

Building 21st Century Workplaces – I was surprised by this one.  I honestly thought it might be a proposal to use federal funds to modernize failing industries, or subsidize the cost of bringing high-speed data links to rural businesses.  Imagine my shock when it talked about how the government is going to work toward “Revamping workplace policies in areas such as discrimination, flexibility, and paid leave will make our workplaces more inclusive to working families and ensure America’s global economic competitiveness in the coming decades.”  Seriously?  We’re going to waste cycles trying to make it easier for people to have a flexible schedule PTO?   Don’t you people have anything better to do with your time?

Investing in High-Tech Manufacturing Did the President get dropped on his head as a baby or something?  Didn’t we just go through five years of the government ‘investing’ in places like Solyndra and Fisker?  We should have taken all of that money and set it on fire.  We would have at least gotten some light and heat out of it.  

Training America’s WorkersI’m sorry, I thought that was what my federal tax dollars that go to the Department of Education went toward, or at least my local property and sales taxes did, for like my entire adult life.  You inbred, twinkle-toed, half-wit excuses for public servants have royally screwed up the best public education system the world had ever known, and now you want to do more?  I wouldn’t trust you jokers to teach wild dogs to eat raw meat, much less teach Billy Ray or Laquisha how to use a plasma torch.

Helping the Long-Term Unemployed How about we help the long-term unemployed by not doing things we know will discourage employers from hiring new people, like forcing them to pay a huge amount for health insurance or raising the minimum wage?  How about you all get the heck out of the way and let business owners make better profits, thereby giving them an incentive to expand capacity and hire more people?

Expanding ApprenticeshipsWow, you finally said something that makes sense.  Of course, you can have all the slots in tech schools and apprenticeship programs you want.  They won’t mean diddly over squat so long as you keep making noises about how no-one ever makes it in life without a degree in underwater upside-down race baiting or whatever it was that you ‘studied’.  Quit making it easy for Little Johnny to go hang out and play XBox with his friends for four years while racking up $50,000 in debt, and maybe he’ll discover that he has a talent for wiring houses or fixing cars because doing so will keep him off the streets.

Increasing Fuel EfficiencyRight, because trying to squeeze another drop out of that particular dried out husk of a lemon is going to make it more likely for the American auto industry to hire more people.  Apparently you never heard of the law of diminishing returns, nor did you ever learn that industry loves efficiency, and would have developed and bought  large fuel-efficient trucks if that could be done economically.  Of course, I’m sure this is going to cost me and my great-great-grandchildren money as you translate “incentivize” to mean “subsidize”.

Cutting Carbon PollutionAnd here we go with the “cut carbon emissions, because they’re icky and magic fairy money will fall from heaven”.  Quit conflating your economic and fiscal policies with your fixation on a single environmental issue.  If your goal is to make Americans better off financially, quit trying to shove higher costs for energy, food, and transportation down our throats.

Connecting Our ClassroomsBecause little Johnny and little Susie need the opportunity to get on FaceBook during English class that much quicker.  See my above comment about basic literacy.

Increasing College OpportunityWell, which is it?  Are you going to encourage more people to get what for most of them will be useless degrees, or are you going to encourage them to go into apprenticeship programs?  

Redesigning High SchoolsAgain, see my earlier comments about literacy.  You know what works for education?  Let’s try a classroom of students that know that if they don’t learn what’s put before them, they run a pretty good chance of starving to death in the cold because they can’t get a job.  Let’s try a classroom where the teacher is not only allowed, but encouraged to cause pain in the life of some jackass who wants to test his manhood by being a little shit?  How about we stop spending a good third of their time learning about sensitivity, down-trodden people, and the evils of capitalistic caucasian males and force the little darlings to learn their multiplication tables again?

DB Note:  At this point, exhausted just thinking about the damage that this guy can do in such a short amount of time, we get to the end of the web site and return to the email.

Thank you,

President Barack Obama

No, thank you, Mr. President.  That was cathartic.  Say hello to the wife and kids for me.

Pop Quiz

OK, kids, everything off your desk and get a number 2 pencil out.

I am going to give you paragraphs from two State of the Union addresses.  Some will be from Richard Nixon’s 1974 address, and some will be from Barack Obama’s 2014 address.  For those of you playing at home, yes, that’s 40 years apart, and yes, it’s both president’s fifth SOTU address.  Please mark them with either an “N” or an “O” on your paper.

Let’s begin:

  1. It was five years ago on the steps of this Capitol that I took the oath of office as your President. In those five years, because of the initiatives undertaken by this administration, the world has changed. America has changed. As a result of those changes, America is safer today, more prosperous today, with greater opportunity for more of its people than ever before in our history.
  2. We will establish a new system that makes high-quality health care available to every American in a dignified manner and at a price he can afford.
  3. To indicate the size of the government commitment, to spur energy research and development, we plan to spend $10 billion in federal funds over the next five years. That is an enormous amount. But during the same five years, private enterprise will be investing as much as $200 billion—and in 10 years, $500 billion—to develop the new resources, the new technology, the new capacity America will require for its energy needs
  4. One measure of a truly free society is the vigor with which it protects the liberties of its individual citizens. As technology has advanced in America, it has increasingly encroached on one of those liberties—what I term the right of personal privacy. Modern information systems, data banks, credit records, mailing list abuses, electronic snooping, the collection of personal data for one purpose that may be used for another—all these have left millions of Americans deeply concerned by the privacy they cherish.
  5. As we create more jobs, as we build a better health care system, as we improve our education, as we develop new sources of energy, as we provide more abundantly for the elderly and the poor, as we strengthen the system of private enterprise that produces our prosperity as we do all of this and even more, we solidify those essential bonds that hold us together as a nation.
  6. And in the coming months, let’s see where else we can make progress together. Let’s make this a year of action. That’s what most Americans want, for all of us in this chamber to focus on their lives, their hopes, their aspirations. And what I believe unites the people of this nation, regardless of race or region or party, young or old, rich or poor, is the simple, profound belief in opportunity for all, the notion that if you work hard and take responsibility, you can get ahead in America.
  7. Meanwhile, my administration will keep working with the industry to sustain production and jobs growth while strengthening protection of our air, our water, our communities. And while we’re at it, I’ll use my authority to protect more of our pristine federal lands for future generations.
  8. And finally, let’s remember that our leadership is defined not just by our defense against threats but by the enormous opportunities to do good and promote understanding around the globe, to forge greater cooperation, to expand new markets, to free people from fear and want. And no one is better positioned to take advantage of those opportunities than America.

(more…)

Aw, Hell No!

In the latest shoe to drop from Edward Snowden, we find out that the National Security Agency and its British counterpart, Government Communications Headquarters, have been reaping personal information, including relationship status and sexual preferences, from the data collected by such common smart phone apps as Google Maps and Angry Birds.  Additionally, the metadata from photographs is being strip mined by the agencies.  Once again, NSA is pinky swearing that they don’t use the data from ordinary Americans unless they’re part of an active investigation, and I imagine that GCHQ is making the same noises through its much abused mouthpiece.

Apart from the “If you’re not going to be using it, why are you collecting and storing it?” question, this brings up the topics of data hygiene and data control.

Data hygiene basically means that you don’t leave your data lying around for others to pick up.  Remember, anything you put on the Internet is available to anyone who cares enough to find it.  Apparently, the same can be said about electronics such as computers, tablets, and smart phones.  If you don’t want others to have and abuse your data, don’t put it out there for them.  Why things like whose slot A you want to mate with your tab B are on an easily lost gadget is beyond me.  But if you’ve been putting such things on your cell phone, congratulations, now the government knows about it, for whatever reason they can find to justify its collection.

TL;DR – Quit putting things you wouldn’t want anyone and everyone knowing on your cell phone.

Next, we have data control.  Do you know what all of those wonderful apps on your iThingie are doing?  Is that game reading your address book and sending it to its corporate masters for marketing?  Is the mapping software grabbing your location requests and your calendars so that developers can find a way to suggest directions to a meeting before you realize you need them?  Did you actually read what you agreed to when you installed and updated it?  Someone could probably make a good living out of investigating what the top 1000 apps on iTunes or Google Play are actually doing and comparing that to their stated purpose.   It would definitely be a job that lasts a long time.

The exploitation of mapping software is particularly insidious.  Look at it this way:  Let’s say that an authoritarian administration wanted to know who was attending meetings of an opposition party.  They find some low-level fleeb to figure out where the meetings are being held, then mine the data from mapping apps to find out who requested directions to and from those locations for the hour or so before the meeting and the hour or so after.  Now you have a pretty accurate list of people who have at least an interest in opposing the government.  You’ll notice that I didn’t say a liberal or conservative, Democrat or Republican, nor did I say Tea Party or Occupy Wall Street in this scenario.  Both sides of the political equation can and will abuse access to such data, and doing so will make their efforts to find, fix, and flatten their opposition a lot easier.

It’s time we demand that the government stop gathering this data without a very specific warrant with a heck of a lot of oversight.  It’s also time we demand that app vendors stop gathering the data, too, or we should stop using their products.

As Respectful A Refutation As I Can Muster

BRM brought up a post from a congressional candidate here in Kentucky who worked through the Christmas season as a temporary worker at one of our area’s largest employers.  Coincidentally, I happen to work at the same employer, and have for several years.  BRM asked me for my comments, and after filling up a comment box over at his place, I decided to just put my thoughts down here.
First and foremost, I don’t speak for my employer, and everything here is my personal opinion. Just wanted to get that out of the way.
I’ve never met Mr. Leach, and since I don’t live in the 2nd Congressional District, his candidacy hasn’t crossed my field of vision news-wise.  From what I can gather from his website, it appears that he’s spent his career in service to the country, and wishes to continue that service by becoming a Congressman.  I don’t agree with some of his positions, but I can respect his desire to serve.Here are my thoughts on his post about working at or near the minimum wage:

  1. I too tip my hat to Mr. Leach for both his military service and his willingness to get into the trenches and get his hands dirty.  Too many politicians on both sides of the aisle are afraid to do so.
  2. Mr. Leach failed to disclose how much of his paycheck was paid to the Teamsters Union, which he disparaged for not getting entry level employees bigger raises over the past few decades, in dues and/or initiation fees.  He also failed to discuss how much of his paycheck was going to pay taxes to support those who refuse to work.  Want to keep more of your paycheck?  Then stop taking money out of it to feed unproductive mouths and to pay union bosses’ salaries.  Welfare reform and right-to-work laws in Kentucky might make things a little better for those who have to watch every dollar.
  3.  It’s an entry level position.  It’s not meant to be your life-long vocation, and it’s certainly not meant to be your single source of income.  Yes, you have to know skills to do it, but so does the kid at the gas station or the waitress at the Waffle House.  More relevant skills usually means more pay.  You will tend to get them as time goes by, assuming that you are willing to put forward the extra effort to make yourself more profitable to your employer, and hence worth the additional pay.
  4. Yes, the cost of living has gone up faster than the rate of income for people on the low end of the pay scale.  That’s what I call a stimulus to do better.  Get educated.  Get skills.  Get a better paying job.  There are plenty of them in and around Louisville if you’re willing to work hard and learn.
  5. I’m sorry that some of his co-workers have degrees and are still loading planes for a living.  When I got out of the Army, I had education and could speak four languages fluently.  My education and language skills meant precisely diddly over squat in the job market and place I found myself.  It was a blow to the gut to realize that the things I had worked so hard for were pretty much worthless.  I adapted, I learned, and I got a good paying job.  If your degree isn’t helping you get the job you want in Louisville, then move somewhere that it will, or write off the degree as a bad investment and do something else.
  6. Mr. Leach talked a lot about how his family wouldn’t have been able to make it without the income from his wife.  So we’re supposed to be surprised that an hourly job that only has 5 or 6 hours a day isn’t enough to feed your family without both people working.  No kidding.  So I guess Mr. Leach found himself in the same position in which most American households find themselves.  Irish Woman and I have never not worked, and that probably isn’t going to change. Not saying that it’s right or wrong, just saying that it’s the reality in the American economy, and probably will be for a very long time.
  7. Again, it’s an entry level job.  If you can’t make it on just that amount of money, get another one.  Heck, get two.  There are “Help Wanted” signs up all over Louisville.  There’s no shame in busting your ass to keep the lights on, if that’s necessary.
  8. I’m shocked that it costs so much to commute to and from your place of employment.  Maybe if the cost of gas were a bit lower, it would help.  I know, maybe if we built a big pipeline to bring more oil from Canada into the United States the supply would go up and the price might come down a tad. Heck, maybe some people might even get a job from the construction and maintenance of the pipeline.  Or hey, maybe if we weren’t paying over 50 cents a gallon in taxes, which are ostensibly to pay for the wonderful roads we enjoy here in Kentucky, the price of a commute might be a little cheaper.  My solution to the problem was to move closer to work and try to maximize fuel economy where I can.  Your mileage may vary.
Like I said, I respect Mr. Leach’s commitment to trying to understand how people in his area make their living, but crying that entry level jobs don’t pay well isn’t going to cut it with me.

Congressional Wishlist

My Congressman put up a post on his FaceBook page* asking his constituents what they wanted from Congress in 2014.  Here are a few of my thoughts:

  1. Passage of the “Firearms Owners Freedom Act” (I know, snowball’s chance)
  2. Passage of the “I Am Not Your Baby Daddy, So Get A Damn Job Act”, which would encourage the chronically impoverished to make better life choices because the rest of us aren’t going to keep footing the bill generation after generation.
  3. The “National Security Agency Mission Definition Act”, which would make it crystal clear that military organizations, even ones like the NSA, are not tools to be used against the American people.  It would move domestic surveillance over to the FBI, and dissolve the FISA courts.  If they need to watch the communications of a U.S. person, then they need a warrant, and they can get one in a court that’s accountable and public.
  4. A House resolution stating that if the President wants to use military force anywhere in the world and it’s not an emergency of national survival, then he needs to come to Congress for a declaration of war.  Not an “Authorization to use force”, but an Honest to God, kill people and break shit, declaration of war.  If it’s not that important, it’s not worth our time, treasure, and blood.
  5. The “Put Up or Shut Up Act” – In which the Congress withdraws all Federal subsidies of private, for-profit companies, be they industrial, energy,  transportation, or whatever.  If a business has an idea good enough to make a product or provide a service that the market wants, then let them get investors and convince consumers to purchase it.

That’s my list.  What do you all think?