• Archives

  • Topics

  • Meta

  • The Boogeyman - Working Vacation
  • Coming Home
  • Via Serica

Questionnaire III

Gun Rights

  1. Please pick from the following sentences the ideas that most clearly reflects your views on gun rights:
    1. People, other than the military and law enforcement, should not have access to firearms.
    2. Firearms must be tightly regulated, and only those who can be trusted should have them.
    3. Firearms must be tightly regulated, but unless the government can prove that someone is ineligible to own a firearm, then they should not stop them.
    4. Firearms should be available to anyone who can pass a background check and can afford to purchase one.
    5. It is none of the government’s business who owns a firearm.
  2. Please select any of these federal firearms related laws that you would want to see repealed or amended:
    1. National Firearms Act of 1934
    2. Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968
    3. Gun Control Act of 1968
    4. Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986
    5. Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988
    6. Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990
    7. Brady Handgun Violence Protection Act of 1993
    8. Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act of 2005
  3. Please select one of the following sentences that most closely reflects your views on the subject of felons and firearms:
    1. Felons should never have access to firearms after their conviction.
    2. Felons, after they have served their time and paid their debt to society, can earn back their rights to firearms and other things through executive action.
    3. Once someone has served their time and paid their debt to society, the government has no business stopping them from exercising any of their rights.
  4. Are you an active member of groups such as the National Rifle Association, Second Amendment Foundation, or Gun Owners of America?  Please list out affiliations and the year you first joined.
  5. Do you own a firearm?
    1. Yes
    2. No
    3. None of your business
  6. Do you have a license to carry a concealed deadly weapon in your home state or territory?
    1. Yes
    2. No
    3. My state does not require a license to carry a concealed deadly weapon
    4. My state or territory has no legal method to carry a concealed deadly weapon
    5. None of your business

Questionnaire II

Military Experience

  1. Are you a veteran of or currently serving in the Armed Forces, to include the active, reserve, and National Guard components of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, and/or Coast Guard?  If not, skip the rest of this section.
  2. Select the range of service years that best describes your military career:
    1. Less than 2 years
    2. 2 to 4 years
    3. 4 to 10 years
    4. 10 to 20 years
    5. More than 20 years
  3. Were you enlisted, officer, warrant officer, or some combination thereof?
  4. Did you earn an honorable discharge on the date of your ETS?
  5. Were you given a less than honorable discharge, even if it was amended to honorable?
  6. Were you ever punished under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice?
  7. Were you ever court-martialed?
  8. Did you attend a service academy?
  9. Were you ever deployed overseas from a domestic base for more than 30 days, not to include Temporary Duty Assignments (TDY)?
  10. Were you ever stationed overseas as part of a multi-year permanent change of station (PCS)?
  11. Are you a combat veteran?
  12. Have you earned any of the following awards?
    1. Purple Heart
    2. Bronze Star with a “V” device
    3. Silver Star
    4. Service Cross (Distinguished Service Cross, Navy Cross, Air Force Cross, Coast Guard Cross)
    5. Medal of Honor
  13. Have you been given a disability rating by the Department of Veteran’s Affairs?
  14. Do you now, or have you ever, utilized VA health benefits?
  15. Are you a member of any military-service related organizations, such as the Veterans of Foreign Wars or the American Legion?

Questionnaire I

Well, we’re coming to the final stretch of the 2014 election cycle, and the 2016 election cycle is warming up in the paddock.  I’ve been giving a lot of thought to the candidates and issues, and I’ve come up with something I wish everyone who seeks elected office would answer.

There are several sections, which I’ll be putting out over the next few days.  Suggestions and comments are always welcome.

Personal

  1. Are you a college graduate?
  2. How many jobs in the private sector have you held since your 18th birthday?
  3. What was the last year in which you held a job in the private sector?
  4. How many years of government employment, in any form, except for military service, do you have?
  5. Do you now, or have you ever owned a business?
  6. Have you ever worked for minimum wage?  At what ages and for how long?
  7. Have you ever been fired or laid off from a job?
  8. Have you ever been on welfare, or used unemployment benefits?
  9. Have you ever worked more than one job at the same time?
  10. Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of a labor union?
  11. Have you ever held elected office before?  Please list them and provide dates.
  12. Have you ever worked on a farm, either as a child or as an adult, for more than 30 days?
  13. Have you ever been arrested?
  14. Have you ever been convicted of a crime?

Repost – A Grim Anniversary

Today is the 10th anniversary of the terrorist attack at Beslan.  Right now, relations with Russia aren’t very good, but I think we should pause to remember that the fanatics that want to kill us also lash out at other great powers.

 

————-

Here in the U.S., we are preparing for the anniversary of the September 11th attacks.  But we are not alone in remembering savagery against innocents this week.  In Russia, families are remembering the hundreds who died at Beslan.

C.J. Chivers over at Esquire did an excellent write-up of the attack back in 2006.  It goes beyond the dry facts to show the small, heroic acts by ordinary people that saved lives.  Every person who thinks about personal security and the lengths that barbarians will go to in order to incite terror should read it.

As a parent, I cannot imagine the shock and anguish of knowing that no matter what you did, your children were probably going to die.  I also dread the thought that our schools are just as wide open and unprotected.

For my friends in Russia, I remember the innocents of Beslan.  They were not soldiers, they were not politicians, they were school-children, parents, and teachers.  I hope that your leaders have learned from the experience, and I hope that my leaders at least think about the possibility of something similar happening here.

Insults and Refutations

Got another email from the White House.  Seriously, it was easier to get off those NSFW email lists one of my buddies put me on when I first got on-line than it is to get off of this one.  My comments, as always, are in italics.

———————-

The House of Representatives just took a vote — and it wasn’t to raise the minimum wage, put in place equal pay, create jobs, or reform our broken immigration system.  Was it for unicorns?  Or maybe a program to put men on the moon again?  Oh, wait, it was a program to put men on unicorns on the moon, wasn’t it?  

Instead, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives just voted to sue the President for using his executive authority. This lawsuit will waste valuable time and potentially millions of taxpayer dollars.  Oh, well, no unicorns.   So they’re suing the President, huh?  Yeah, probably a political stunt, because no court is going to touch that with a 10 foot gavel (Nancy Pelosi has one, ask her).  But if you’re going to hit them for wasting time and millions of dollars, let’s talk about President “What I did on my summer vacation”.

This is the least productive Congress in decades. And instead of doing their job, they are suing the President for doing his.  Sparky, let’s talk about that.  The President has the job of executing the laws as written, assuming that they are constitutional.  He is the commander-in-chief of the armed forces.  He isn’t supposed to be rewriting the laws, selectively refusing to enforce parts of a law that he himself, the President, el Jefe Grande, signed into law and pushed long and hard for, or just making it up as he goes along.

The President is committed to making a difference for the millions of hardworking Americans trying to do right by their families and communities. While Republicans in Congress continue to waste taxpayer money, this President is going to keep doing his job.  Unless, of course, you don’t think that his job is to work on not pulling his putt, racking up those sweet Air Force One frequent-flyer miles, and having photo-ops as far away from the Mexican border as possible.

President Obama remains ready and willing to work with Republicans in Congress if they decide to get serious and do something for the American people. But he is also committed to acting even as Congress won’t. You’ve seen that time and time again this year — from raising the federal minimum wage on new federal government contracts, to expanding apprenticeship opportunities and making student loan payments more affordable.  Which is why when I am elected in 2016, the first thing I will do is rescind each and every one of these things.  Executive orders are supposed to be rare and extraordinary.  He’s put out more of these things in the past couple of years than I have pizza orders.  If Congress won’t act, then you go on TV and bad mouth Congress.  Get people to step on their neck a little, and watch how the legislation starts to flow.  Of course, if he could get Harry Reid to allow votes on things that aren’t right out of his grimoire, maybe a little compromise legislation might make its way to the President’s desk.  Heck, he might even get away with signing or vetoing legislation on the back of his golf cart.

The President is not going to back away from his efforts to use his authority to solve problems and help American families. In fact, tomorrow, President Obama will announce his next executive action to crack down on federal contractors who put workers’ safety and hard-earned pay at risk. It’s just the next in a series of steps this Administration will be taking this year to make sure that American workers are getting a fair deal, and he has pledged to take executive action to deal with our broken immigration system in the months ahead.  Let me try this again.  The Congress makes laws, the President implements laws, and the Courts interpret the laws.  That’s how it’s supposed to work.  If he wanted the job of making laws, he should have stayed in the Senate longer than it takes a good coat of paint to dry.  If he wanted to interpret laws, then he should have paid attention in law school and become a judge.  As for giving us a ‘fair deal’, the only deal I’m looking for is for my employer to give me the pay and benefits he promised me when I hired on.  If I had hired on at poverty wages with no job security because I didn’t think it was a good idea to pay attention in school and get some marketable skills, then that would be a shame on me, now wouldn’t it?  

That’s what this President is focused on. If you want to see it continue, and are sick and tired of stunts like the House Republicans’ lawsuit, then say so: <Insert Link to Propaganda Page Bought And Paid For With My Tax Dollars>.  Here’s what I want the House and the President to do.  I want them, along with the Senate, to meet as co-equal members of our government, hammer out real legislation, and then get on with life.  I prefer gridlock to the last 15 years or so of ideologically driven crap that’s come out of Washington, no matter who’s in the White House or controls the Congress.  

Thanks,

Dan

Dan Pfeiffer
Senior Advisor
The White House
<Twitter Link So We Can Get Even More Of This Drivel>

 

No, thank you, Dan.  Enjoy the next 30 months of hanging out with the world’s busiest scratch golfer.

Press Release

I got this from the NRA this morning.  I’m passing it on because I think voting is one of the most important things you can do as a citizen.  To put it bluntly, my ancestors didn’t come to this country so that I could sit on the sidelines and gaze at my navel on election day.  If you’re not registered, time is running out for this year’s cycle.  Get off your butt and get registered.

———————————————————-

National Rifle Association’s Freedom Action Foundation Announces 2014 “Trigger the Vote” Voter Registration Campaign

Honorary Chairman Chuck Norris Will Lead the Campaign to Defend our Freedom

Fairfax, Va. – The National Rifle Association’s Freedom Action Foundation (NRA-FAF) announced the kickoff of its 2014 “Trigger the Vote” voter registration campaign, and also unveiled its captivating new ad, “Father and Son,” which can be viewed here.

The campaign once again enjoys the support of Honorary Chairman Chuck Norris, and will soon be releasing exclusive new videos featuring Norris that can’t be seen anywhere else.

One of the missions of NRA-FAF is to protect the Second Amendment through a vigorous non-partisan voter registration program. The initial “Trigger the Vote” campaign was introduced in 2009, and it has expanded in scope and reach in every election cycle since.  The program uses a variety of means of communications to connect gun owners and Second Amendment supporters with tools to facilitate the voter registration process, and ensure that they are prepared to cast an informed ballot on Election Day.  Trigger the Vote field teams have been visiting events across the nation since May of this year to register new voters in person.

This year, Trigger the Vote is also releasing its redesigned website, www.TriggerTheVote.org . The site has new, robust user-friendly tools to help gun owners and Second Amendment supporters easily register to vote, check to make sure their existing registration is current, as well as locate their polling place.

“The Freedom Action Foundation is one of the most critical parts of the NRA,” explained NRA-FAF President Chris W. Cox. “Through its valuable work, the NRA is able to reach millions of freedom-loving Americans and ensure that they are prepared to exercise their right to vote.”

To learn more about Trigger the Vote and how you can be a part of it, please visit www.TriggerTheVote.org .

Sneek Peek

I received an email today from the White House about a great new idea they’ve had:  a White House Maker Faire:

We’ve got another big first happening at the White House tomorrow, and our guests are making a lot of things besides history:

President Obama will celebrate innovators, entrepreneurs, and tinkerers of all ages from across the country at the first-ever White House Maker Faire.

What do we mean by “Makers,” exactly?

New technologies such as 3D printers, laser cutters, and easy-to-use design software are enabling more Americans to make and build almost anything these days.

Tomorrow’s Maker Faire will feature new and innovative projects, inventions, and designs that are sure to amaze — and some of these projects may very well create industries and jobs of the future.

We here at DaddyBear News Network, where if we can’t find it out, we make it up, are pleased to give you a brief, exclusive sample of the projects and technologies you’ll see tomorrow.

Andy Acetlyene, an accountant and tinkerer from Albuquerque, will be demonstrating his technique for using a plasma torch to cut holes in the very fabric of the Republic.

Lisa Lignin, a materials engineer and textile artist from Leadville, has volunteered to show the Secretary of State how to knit together a coherent foreign policy out of llama wool and wishful thinking.

Kristy Kraftmacher, an administrative assistant and amateur inventor from Kalamazoo, will be showing us how to use all that military gear being used by small police forces to make giant robots for…. things.

Wally Windmeyer, a lawyer and volunteer lobbyist from Washington, has everyone excited with the news that he will be using his 3D printer to grow a spine for the President.

Tune in tomorrow for these and other amazing demonstrations of how we can use technology to make a better tomorrow!

A Response

Earlier today, Alison Lundergan Grimes, the Democrat candidate for Senator in Kentucky, released an open letter to the 40% of Republicans in the Commonwealth who voted against Senator Mitch McConnell in this week’s primary election.  In it, she expressed the following items as places where she has common views with those of us who aren’t in her party but are sick and tired of the status quo:

I, too, believe Washington, D.C. is not working for Kentucky.

I, too, believe that the federal government should help or get out of the way.

I, too, want Republicans and Democrats to work together to cut spending and to help Kentucky businesses create jobs.

I, too, believe we should close the tax loopholes that encourage big corporations to ship our good-paying Kentucky jobs overseas.

I, too, believe that we should balance the budget, protect our veterans, and work to leave the next generation a better country than the one given to us.

She asked us to keep an open mind, learn about her positions, and then make our own decision as to whether or not to support her election bid.

So, in the interests of finding common ground, here are the things I need Mrs. Grimes to do in order to get behind her campaign:

  1. Publicly repudiate President Obama’s efforts to circumvent the Constitution by governing through executive fiat and changing what the law means and requires without Congressional action.
  2. Fully support repeal of the Affordable Care Act.  I’m willing to discuss replacement of the act once it’s gone, but first it must go.
  3. A commitment to fully and impartially investigate the misuse of our countries intelligence organs to indiscriminately and unconstitutionally gather data on the communications and lives of law-abiding citizens without a warrant.
  4. A public affirmation that the Constitution is the highest law of the land, that it is a limiting document on the government and not the people, and that she will block any legislation that seeks to abridge the rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
    • This should come with a commitment to block the nomination of any person who does not demonstrably support this position.
  5. A commitment to work to balance the budget by cutting the fat out of entitlements and government waste, not by raising taxes on those of us who bother to roll out of bed in the morning, put on our game face, and work to keep the wheels on.
  6. A commitment to only seek reelection once.

If I can get these things from Mrs. Grimes, we’ll discuss whether or not I’ll consider voting for her.  Until then, all I can do is wish her luck and ask her to look elsewhere for support.

A Modest Proposal

I’m sure that most of you are aware of the ongoing scandal centered around the Veteran’s Administration healthcare system.  Allegations that VA staff have faked records to hide long waits for care, waits so long that some veterans have died while waiting to be seen, are coming from all corners of the system.  Veterans, from World War II to Afghanistan, are suffering, and it is a national shame.

VA Secretary Shinseki seems to be unable to deal with the problem, and the dispatching of a couple of White House flunkies to ‘investigate’ the issue isn’t going to cut it.  Something radical has to happen, and here’s my idea.

Currently, the VA is a cabinet level agency, run mostly by civilian bureaucrats.  Accountability, indeed the sense of honor that an organization entrusted with the care of those who have earned it with their blood requires, has been watered down and seems to have disappeared.  That has to change.

I propose the formation of a Joint Veteran’s Services Command, composed of military officers and NCO’s from all of the uniformed services.  This new command would be a major command under the Department of Defense, like the Joint Special Operations Command.  All current VA facilities and responsibilities should be moved under this new organization, but not all of the personnel.

The civilian management and ‘leadership’ of the current VA would be pretty much flushed out like the waste that it is.  They can be paid off and shown the door, or they can be thoroughly investigated and then shown the door, whichever is quicker.  They would be replaced with military leadership, from NCO’s and junior officers providing supervision in clinics and offices, to a general officer heading up the new organization.  The actual medical providers, case managers, and such could still be civilian employees, but their leadership, and therefore their direction, would come from military servicemembers.  Let today’s soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines make sure that our veterans get the care they deserve.  I would love to be a fly on the wall when a VA case manager near Fort Bragg tries to give a World War II or Vietnam veteran the runaround when her supervisor is a paratrooper who fought in Afghanistan.

Would it be perfect?  Absolutely not.  Anyone who’s worn a uniform knows that military bureaucracies can be as infuriating and inefficient as those in the civilian world.   The difference here, from my point of view, would be that military leadership of VA facilities would have a dog in the fight and they would know that they will be held accountable for failure.  Someday, they will leave the service and become veterans, and they will want the facilities and services they will need to be top-notch.  Additionally, a servicemember who is derelict in her duty can be relieved for cause, or even prosecuted, a much different situation than we find with the unionized federal civilians who are neglecting our veterans today.

Doing this might not solve all the problems, but it would be an improvement.

The Analogy of the Gilded Turd

Let’s say there’s an institution in your town that does quite a bit of good, but gets most of its publicity from the spectacles it puts on for the public.  It just so happens that one day the organization discovers that the place in which they hold these spectacles has been turned, as if by magic, into a humongous pile of fecal matter.  The local news media fall over themselves to demonstrate how dried out and smelly the thing is, and the person in charge of putting on the spectacles, which are really the only reason that anyone outside of your area knows about the organization, threatens to find employment elsewhere unless that turd is replaced with something better.

So, after much hemming and hawing, not to mention shouting and gnashing of teeth, a new palace of spectacles is built.  It’s wonderful.  In fact, it is literally made of gold.  From the sub-basement to the highest peak of the roof, it’s a beautiful sight to behold.

Of course, it cost hundreds of millions of dollars to build, most of which is being paid for with your taxes.  And you’re also on the hook to pay, again with your tax revenue, for a lot of the cost of running it and keeping the palace looking good.  But hey, they’re putting on not only the old type of spectacles, but also circuses, concerts, and lots of other fun things, so maybe the place will pay for itself.  Possibly.  After a few years. Maybe.

So one day you take your family down to see a show at the palace of spectacles, and it is indeed gorgeous.  But during a bathroom break, you notice a few cracks in the golden floor.  Looking down one of the cracks, you notice that the glitter of gold only extends down a few inches.  Asking the nearest attendant about it, you learn that it’s only gold plated, because nobody cares about anything but how wonderful the place looks.  You inquire as to what lays beneath the gold, and after much umming and awwing and shuffling of feet, she admits that under the gilding, it’s a big pile of feces, just like the last place.

Down the road, the other big palace of spectacles in the state has lost a lot of its golden covering, and the feces are really starting to shine through.  Imagine your surprise when you find out that the estimate for taxpayer funding to apply a new coat of gold paint, because who in their right mind is going to pay for gold plating these days, is $80 million.  Being the forward thinking person you are, you look at the local palace of spectacles, and estimate that you’re probably going to be on the hook for at least that much in a couple of decades when its gilding starts to rub off and the stench gets too powerful.

So there you are, a taxpayer, on the hook for hundreds of millions of dollars in bonds for constructing your local gilded turd, and looking at hundreds of millions more over the next couple of decades to keep the shine on it, as well as the one just down the road.  But, hey, they put on such great spectacles!

At some point, people in Kentucky, if not the rest of the country, need to stop polishing and gilding turds so that professional sports organizations don’t have to pay for their own minor leagues.  Public  universities were established so that the children of a state could get a good education without having to go to the Ivy League for it, not so that grown men and women could bounce a rubber ball up and down a court or try to knock each other down while fighting over a vaguely egg-shaped ball.  We can’t afford this anymore here in Kentucky, and I wouldn’t be surprised if the rest of the country isn’t in the same shape.

My solution to the problem?  Quit using taxpayer money to fund any sports at the collegiate level.  Force the sundry athletic programs to be self-funded or get sponsorship from private entities such as alumni organizations or local corporations.  That funding should include the costs of the facilities they utilize, especially the opulent stadiums and practice facilities.  If they can’t do that, close them down, sell the stadiums to the highest bidder, and quit throwing good money after bad.

But, DB, you say, we just built the KFC Yum! Center.  Tearing it down or selling it would be a waste of all those hundreds of millions of dollars you were just complaining about.  I’d agree that doing so would be a tremendous waste, but that money’s a sunk cost, and it’s probably already been wasted, so what’s the point of continuing to pay to operate and keep up the stadium?  And don’t forget, in 20 years, we’re going to be faced with the blackmail of “If you don’t refurbish the Yum! Center, I’m going to quit and take my best players with me!”, which is how we got where we are in the first place.  At least, so far, the legislature has had the sense to not commit us to paying to refurbish Rupp Arena in Lexington, but I have little faith that they will stick to their guns in the long run.

Kentuckians need to stop giving into the blackmail, call the bluffs of the athletes, coaches, and athletic directors, and stop slapping a new coat of glittery whitewash on the turd that is collegiate sports.  I’ll gladly vote for $380 million in bonds to refurbish and improve the educational facilities of not only the universities, but also to reinvigorate our trade schools and improve our public elementary, middle, and high schools across the state.  But I balk at the cost of providing a palace for grown people to play and watch games.